HJRES 190 — 119th Congress

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to clarify the 14th amendment does not provide for automatic citizenship for the children of aliens.

Introduced Jun 2, 2026 Open for voting
Note: Bill summaries and components on this page are AI-generated and may contain errors. Always consult the original bill text and official sources before relying on this information.
← Open legislation
Click Vote to enable simultaneous voting.

Core Policy Mechanism Top 1

Restrict Birthright Citizenship via Constitutional Amendment

  • Population Scope High The amendment would affect all children born on U.S. soil to parents who are neither citizens, nationals, nor lawful permanent residents — a population numbering in the hundreds of thousands annually based on current birth rates to undocumented and temporary-status immigrants. Beyond newborns, the amendment's ratification would prospectively affect every future birth in this category indefinitely, and retrospective questions could arise for existing individuals depending on implementing legislation.
  • Budgetary Magnitude Low The joint resolution contains no appropriation, authorization of funds, or budgetary provision of any kind; it is a proposed constitutional amendment that redefines a legal standard without directing any expenditure. Any downstream administrative costs would arise only from future implementing legislation authorized by Section 2, not from this text itself.
  • Legal / Regulatory Depth High The amendment would substantively alter the constitutional baseline for birthright citizenship by redefining 'subject to the jurisdiction of the United States' in the 14th Amendment — eliminating an existing constitutional right to citizenship for a class of persons born on U.S. soil and establishing a new parental-status requirement as a condition of that right. This is a fundamental restructuring of a constitutional entitlement, not a procedural change to agency conduct.
  • Degree of Discretion Granted Medium Section 1 of the proposed amendment uses mandatory language ('may only be considered') that leaves no discretion in applying the parental-status threshold, making the citizenship determination rule. However, Section 2 grants Congress broad, open-ended authority to 'carry out this article through appropriate legislation,' conferring significant future discretion over implementing mechanisms, enforcement, and any edge cases not addressed in the amendment text itself.
  • Implementation & Enforcement Burden Medium The amendment itself creates no enforcement mechanisms, penalties, or compliance requirements, but its adoption would require government actors — including federal immigration agencies, vital records offices, and courts — to verify parental citizenship or residency status at or after birth, imposing a new operational and adjudicative burden. The scope of that burden would depend substantially on implementing legislation authorized by Section 2, but the constitutional change inherently necessitates new status-determination processes for a large volume of births.
  • Temporal Commitment High The proposed amendment contains no sunset clause, expiration date, or mandatory reauthorization requirement; once ratified, it would become a permanent part of the Constitution and could only be superseded by a subsequent constitutional amendment. Under the M6 framework, the absence of any forced revisit or expiry means it persists indefinitely until Congress and the states affirmatively act to undo it.
No signal yet
{# ── Possible-riders meta card + individual rider-candidate cards ── Under the new schema (decisions §"User-determined rider heat-check"), these are heat-check candidates surfaced for community judgment, NOT AI-confirmed riders. Frontend overhaul will replace this meta-card with the heat-check overlay (toggle UI + ratio display); for now the scaffolding renders with corrected copy. #}

No possible riders have been surfaced for this bill.

Summary

This joint resolution proposes a constitutional amendment to clarify the scope of birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment. It would define 'subject to the jurisdiction of the United States' to require that at least one parent be a U.S. citizen, U.S. national, or lawful permanent resident, thereby excluding children born on U.S. soil to parents who lack those statuses from automatic citizenship. The amendment would take effect upon ratification by three-fourths of state legislatures within seven years of submission.

AI-generated summary, pending human review.

Full bill text rendering is coming soon.

In the meantime, read the full text on Congress.gov ↗.

Version Event Date User support Your vote Roll calls
Original
Initial publication
Jun 2, 2026
Jun 2, 2026 No votes yet

Core Policy Mechanism Top 1

Restrict Birthright Citizenship via Constitutional Amendment

  • Population Scope High The amendment would affect all children born on U.S. soil to parents who are neither citizens, nationals, nor lawful permanent residents — a population numbering in the hundreds of thousands annually based on current birth rates to undocumented and temporary-status immigrants. Beyond newborns, the amendment's ratification would prospectively affect every future birth in this category indefinitely, and retrospective questions could arise for existing individuals depending on implementing legislation.
  • Budgetary Magnitude Low The joint resolution contains no appropriation, authorization of funds, or budgetary provision of any kind; it is a proposed constitutional amendment that redefines a legal standard without directing any expenditure. Any downstream administrative costs would arise only from future implementing legislation authorized by Section 2, not from this text itself.
  • Legal / Regulatory Depth High The amendment would substantively alter the constitutional baseline for birthright citizenship by redefining 'subject to the jurisdiction of the United States' in the 14th Amendment — eliminating an existing constitutional right to citizenship for a class of persons born on U.S. soil and establishing a new parental-status requirement as a condition of that right. This is a fundamental restructuring of a constitutional entitlement, not a procedural change to agency conduct.
  • Degree of Discretion Granted Medium Section 1 of the proposed amendment uses mandatory language ('may only be considered') that leaves no discretion in applying the parental-status threshold, making the citizenship determination rule. However, Section 2 grants Congress broad, open-ended authority to 'carry out this article through appropriate legislation,' conferring significant future discretion over implementing mechanisms, enforcement, and any edge cases not addressed in the amendment text itself.
  • Implementation & Enforcement Burden Medium The amendment itself creates no enforcement mechanisms, penalties, or compliance requirements, but its adoption would require government actors — including federal immigration agencies, vital records offices, and courts — to verify parental citizenship or residency status at or after birth, imposing a new operational and adjudicative burden. The scope of that burden would depend substantially on implementing legislation authorized by Section 2, but the constitutional change inherently necessitates new status-determination processes for a large volume of births.
  • Temporal Commitment High The proposed amendment contains no sunset clause, expiration date, or mandatory reauthorization requirement; once ratified, it would become a permanent part of the Constitution and could only be superseded by a subsequent constitutional amendment. Under the M6 framework, the absence of any forced revisit or expiry means it persists indefinitely until Congress and the states affirmatively act to undo it.
No signal yet

Core Policy Mechanism

Restrict Birthright Citizenship via Constitutional Amendment