Full bill text rendering is coming soon.
In the meantime, read the full text on Congress.gov ↗.
Core Policy Mechanism Top 5
Reinstate EPA environmental regulations as of Jan. 19, 2025
Requires the EPA to restore all regulations, guidance, and enforcement programs covering greenhouse gases, methane, air toxics, and vehicle emissions that were in effect before early 2025, and bars executive officials from weakening them again without a new law.
- Population Scope High Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) air quality, greenhouse gas, and vehicle emissions rules affect virtually all U.S. residents and a broad swath of regulated industries nationwide.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low No funds are authorized or appropriated by this provision; funding is addressed in a separate section.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Creates a new statutory mandate compelling agency reinstatement of specific regulations and imposes a binding prohibition on executive deregulatory action absent congressional authorization — a fundamental constraint on executive discretion across multiple regulatory programs.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Low Mandatory 'shall' language with a 60-day deadline leaves the Administrator no discretion on whether to reinstate; the prohibition on weakening rules further eliminates executive flexibility.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden High Reinstating multiple overlapping regulatory regimes simultaneously within 60 days requires substantial agency infrastructure, and the prohibition on weakening rules creates an ongoing compliance obligation enforceable through the Act's citizen-suit provision.
- Temporal Commitment High Both the reinstatement mandate and the anti-deregulation prohibition persist indefinitely until Congress affirmatively acts to change them.
No signal yet
Funding / Appropriations Top 5
Authorize ~$11 billion annually for EPA operations and enforcement
Authorizes about $11 billion per year for EPA operations starting in 2027, adjusted for inflation each year, and sets a minimum staffing and funding floor for the agency's civil and criminal enforcement divisions.
- Population Scope High Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) enforcement capacity affects all persons and entities subject to federal environmental law, spanning virtually the entire U.S. population and regulated sector.
- Budgetary Magnitude High Authorizes approximately $11 billion annually starting in FY2027, inflation-adjusted each year — a large recurring discretionary authorization subject to the annual appropriations process.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth Medium Establishes a statutory authorization ceiling and a minimum enforcement staffing floor, which are procedural and structural constraints on agency resource allocation rather than changes to substantive environmental law.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Low The minimum enforcement staffing floor is mandatory, and the authorization figure is fixed (inflation-adjusted), leaving Congress and the Administrator little discretion below that floor.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Medium Requires annual enforcement reports to Congress and maintenance of minimum staffing levels, creating recurring reporting and administrative obligations but no new penalty or adjudicatory machinery.
- Temporal Commitment High The annual authorization recurs indefinitely for each fiscal year after FY2027 with no expiration, persisting until Congress acts to eliminate it.
No signal yet
Core Policy Mechanism Top 5
Reconstitute EPA advisory boards; require science-based rulemaking
Requires the EPA to rebuild its scientific advisory boards without members tied to regulated industries, and mandates that all regulatory decisions be grounded in peer-reviewed science, changing the legal standard for how the agency makes rules. Requires the EPA to use a specific dollar value and discount rate for greenhouse gas harm — called the social cost of carbon — when writing rules, setting a binding methodology for how the agency weighs climate costs in its decisions.
- Population Scope High The science-based rulemaking standard governs all future Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulatory decisions, affecting all regulated industries and the public subject to EPA rules nationwide.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low No funds are authorized or appropriated by this provision.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Creates a new statutory evidentiary standard binding all EPA rulemaking, imposes eligibility restrictions on federal advisory body membership, and fixes a specific social cost of carbon methodology — each a new substantive legal constraint on agency authority.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Low Mandatory obligations with specific deadlines and prescribed metrics (45-day reconstitution, $190/ton at 2% discount rate) leave the Administrator no discretion on compliance.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Medium Reconstituting advisory boards and applying the science standard require procedural reform across rulemaking processes, but do not establish new penalties or enforcement infrastructure beyond what the citizen-suit provision supplies.
- Temporal Commitment High The peer-reviewed science standard and social cost of carbon methodology apply to all future rulemakings indefinitely, persisting until Congress acts to change them.
No signal yet
Core Policy Mechanism Top 5
Restore environmental justice programs and enforcement priorities
Requires the EPA to rebuild environmental justice (EJ) programs that were shut down after early 2025, prioritize monitoring and enforcement in heavily polluted communities, and conduct public health impact assessments and cumulative impacts analysis for rules affecting air or water quality.
- Population Scope Medium Directly targets communities experiencing disproportionate pollution burdens — a significant but geographically and demographically defined subset of the U.S. population, likely below 25% nationally.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low No specific dollar amount is authorized; program restoration is expressly subject to appropriations without an independent funding figure.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Creates new statutory mandates requiring program restoration, a legal duty to prioritize enforcement in overburdened communities, and mandatory cumulative impacts analysis in permitting — each a new substantive obligation that changes how the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) must exercise existing authority.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Low Mandatory 'shall' language governs program restoration, health impact assessments, cumulative impacts analysis, and annual reporting, leaving the Administrator no discretion on whether to comply.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden High Standing up dismantled EJ programs, conducting health impact assessments for all relevant rulemakings, incorporating cumulative impacts into permitting, and publishing annual reports collectively impose a large and recurring administrative load.
- Temporal Commitment High Cumulative impacts requirements and annual reporting obligations apply on an ongoing basis with no expiration, persisting indefinitely until Congress acts.
No signal yet
Implementation & Enforcement Top 5
Private cause of action and attorney's fees for EPA noncompliance
Allows any person harmed by the EPA's failure to follow this law to sue in federal court, and lets courts order the agency to comply and award legal fees to winning plaintiffs, creating a new private enforcement right against the EPA.
- Population Scope Medium Standing extends to any adversely affected person, a broad class in theory, but meaningful use is concentrated among communities and individuals actively harmed by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) noncompliance — a sizable but not universally exercised right.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low No funds are authorized or appropriated; attorney's fees are court-awarded from parties, not from appropriated funds.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Creates a new private right of action against a federal agency, grants federal courts authority to compel agency compliance, and authorizes fee-shifting — a new enforceable entitlement that did not exist under prior law.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Low Courts are empowered to order compliance and award fees upon a finding of noncompliance, leaving little discretion to the Administrator once a court acts.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden High Creates a new private litigation channel that can be invoked by any adversely affected person, exposing EPA to recurring federal court proceedings and compliance orders as an enforcement mechanism.
- Temporal Commitment High The private right of action operates immediately upon enactment and continues indefinitely, with no expiration or mandatory reauthorization.
No signal yet
Core Policy Mechanism
Preserve state authority and existing legal rights
Ensures that states can set stricter environmental rules than federal law requires, and protects the existing rights of individuals and states to petition the EPA or bring nuisance claims in court — this Act does not limit those rights.
No signal yet
Core Policy Mechanism
Preserve state authority and existing legal rights
Ensures that states can set stricter environmental rules than federal law requires, and protects the existing rights of individuals and states to petition the EPA or bring nuisance claims in court — this Act does not limit those rights.
No signal yet
Summary
This bill directs the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to restore environmental regulations and programs that were rolled back after January 19, 2025. It covers a wide range of protections, including rules on air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, vehicle standards, and environmental justice. Among other elements, the bill * reinstates EPA regulations across multiple pollution categories that were in effect before early 2025; * bars the President and EPA from weakening those rules again without a new act of Congress; * requires EPA's scientific advisory boards to be reconstituted without industry-affiliated members, and mandates that rules be grounded in peer-reviewed science; * restores environmental justice programs and requires health impact assessments for rules affecting air or water quality; * authorizes roughly $11 billion per year for EPA operations and sets a funding floor for enforcement staff; and * allows people harmed by EPA's failure to follow the law to sue in federal court.
AI-generated summary, pending human review.
| Version | Event | Date | User support | Your vote | Roll calls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Original |
Initial publication
Sep 17, 2026
|
Sep 17, 2026 | No votes yet | — | — |
Log in or create an account to record your vote on this legislation. Results are visible to all visitors.
Core Policy Mechanism Top 5
Reinstate EPA environmental regulations as of Jan. 19, 2025
Requires the EPA to restore all regulations, guidance, and enforcement programs covering greenhouse gases, methane, air toxics, and vehicle emissions that were in effect before early 2025, and bars executive officials from weakening them again without a new law.
- Population Scope High Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) air quality, greenhouse gas, and vehicle emissions rules affect virtually all U.S. residents and a broad swath of regulated industries nationwide.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low No funds are authorized or appropriated by this provision; funding is addressed in a separate section.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Creates a new statutory mandate compelling agency reinstatement of specific regulations and imposes a binding prohibition on executive deregulatory action absent congressional authorization — a fundamental constraint on executive discretion across multiple regulatory programs.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Low Mandatory 'shall' language with a 60-day deadline leaves the Administrator no discretion on whether to reinstate; the prohibition on weakening rules further eliminates executive flexibility.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden High Reinstating multiple overlapping regulatory regimes simultaneously within 60 days requires substantial agency infrastructure, and the prohibition on weakening rules creates an ongoing compliance obligation enforceable through the Act's citizen-suit provision.
- Temporal Commitment High Both the reinstatement mandate and the anti-deregulation prohibition persist indefinitely until Congress affirmatively acts to change them.
No signal yet
Core Policy Mechanism
Reinstate EPA environmental regulations as of Jan. 19, 2025
Funding / Appropriations Top 5
Authorize ~$11 billion annually for EPA operations and enforcement
Authorizes about $11 billion per year for EPA operations starting in 2027, adjusted for inflation each year, and sets a minimum staffing and funding floor for the agency's civil and criminal enforcement divisions.
- Population Scope High Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) enforcement capacity affects all persons and entities subject to federal environmental law, spanning virtually the entire U.S. population and regulated sector.
- Budgetary Magnitude High Authorizes approximately $11 billion annually starting in FY2027, inflation-adjusted each year — a large recurring discretionary authorization subject to the annual appropriations process.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth Medium Establishes a statutory authorization ceiling and a minimum enforcement staffing floor, which are procedural and structural constraints on agency resource allocation rather than changes to substantive environmental law.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Low The minimum enforcement staffing floor is mandatory, and the authorization figure is fixed (inflation-adjusted), leaving Congress and the Administrator little discretion below that floor.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Medium Requires annual enforcement reports to Congress and maintenance of minimum staffing levels, creating recurring reporting and administrative obligations but no new penalty or adjudicatory machinery.
- Temporal Commitment High The annual authorization recurs indefinitely for each fiscal year after FY2027 with no expiration, persisting until Congress acts to eliminate it.
No signal yet
Funding / Appropriations
Authorize ~$11 billion annually for EPA operations and enforcement
Core Policy Mechanism Top 5
Reconstitute EPA advisory boards; require science-based rulemaking
Requires the EPA to rebuild its scientific advisory boards without members tied to regulated industries, and mandates that all regulatory decisions be grounded in peer-reviewed science, changing the legal standard for how the agency makes rules. Requires the EPA to use a specific dollar value and discount rate for greenhouse gas harm — called the social cost of carbon — when writing rules, setting a binding methodology for how the agency weighs climate costs in its decisions.
- Population Scope High The science-based rulemaking standard governs all future Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulatory decisions, affecting all regulated industries and the public subject to EPA rules nationwide.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low No funds are authorized or appropriated by this provision.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Creates a new statutory evidentiary standard binding all EPA rulemaking, imposes eligibility restrictions on federal advisory body membership, and fixes a specific social cost of carbon methodology — each a new substantive legal constraint on agency authority.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Low Mandatory obligations with specific deadlines and prescribed metrics (45-day reconstitution, $190/ton at 2% discount rate) leave the Administrator no discretion on compliance.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Medium Reconstituting advisory boards and applying the science standard require procedural reform across rulemaking processes, but do not establish new penalties or enforcement infrastructure beyond what the citizen-suit provision supplies.
- Temporal Commitment High The peer-reviewed science standard and social cost of carbon methodology apply to all future rulemakings indefinitely, persisting until Congress acts to change them.
No signal yet
Core Policy Mechanism
Reconstitute EPA advisory boards; require science-based rulemaking
Core Policy Mechanism Top 5
Restore environmental justice programs and enforcement priorities
Requires the EPA to rebuild environmental justice (EJ) programs that were shut down after early 2025, prioritize monitoring and enforcement in heavily polluted communities, and conduct public health impact assessments and cumulative impacts analysis for rules affecting air or water quality.
- Population Scope Medium Directly targets communities experiencing disproportionate pollution burdens — a significant but geographically and demographically defined subset of the U.S. population, likely below 25% nationally.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low No specific dollar amount is authorized; program restoration is expressly subject to appropriations without an independent funding figure.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Creates new statutory mandates requiring program restoration, a legal duty to prioritize enforcement in overburdened communities, and mandatory cumulative impacts analysis in permitting — each a new substantive obligation that changes how the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) must exercise existing authority.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Low Mandatory 'shall' language governs program restoration, health impact assessments, cumulative impacts analysis, and annual reporting, leaving the Administrator no discretion on whether to comply.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden High Standing up dismantled EJ programs, conducting health impact assessments for all relevant rulemakings, incorporating cumulative impacts into permitting, and publishing annual reports collectively impose a large and recurring administrative load.
- Temporal Commitment High Cumulative impacts requirements and annual reporting obligations apply on an ongoing basis with no expiration, persisting indefinitely until Congress acts.
No signal yet
Core Policy Mechanism
Restore environmental justice programs and enforcement priorities
Implementation & Enforcement Top 5
Private cause of action and attorney's fees for EPA noncompliance
Allows any person harmed by the EPA's failure to follow this law to sue in federal court, and lets courts order the agency to comply and award legal fees to winning plaintiffs, creating a new private enforcement right against the EPA.
- Population Scope Medium Standing extends to any adversely affected person, a broad class in theory, but meaningful use is concentrated among communities and individuals actively harmed by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) noncompliance — a sizable but not universally exercised right.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low No funds are authorized or appropriated; attorney's fees are court-awarded from parties, not from appropriated funds.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Creates a new private right of action against a federal agency, grants federal courts authority to compel agency compliance, and authorizes fee-shifting — a new enforceable entitlement that did not exist under prior law.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Low Courts are empowered to order compliance and award fees upon a finding of noncompliance, leaving little discretion to the Administrator once a court acts.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden High Creates a new private litigation channel that can be invoked by any adversely affected person, exposing EPA to recurring federal court proceedings and compliance orders as an enforcement mechanism.
- Temporal Commitment High The private right of action operates immediately upon enactment and continues indefinitely, with no expiration or mandatory reauthorization.
No signal yet
Implementation & Enforcement
Private cause of action and attorney's fees for EPA noncompliance
Incomplete vote
You have not made a selection on all required items:
Choose Neutral if you prefer not to commit. Leaving without completing will remove all your votes for this bill from the totals.
Maximum recommendations reached
You have already recommended the maximum number of components allowed on this bill. To recommend [new component], choose one of your current recommendations to unselect: