Full bill text rendering is coming soon.
In the meantime, read the full text on Congress.gov ↗.
Core Policy Mechanism Top 5
Expand premium tax credit eligibility, revise contribution table
Removes the income ceiling on ACA marketplace premium tax credits and replaces the sliding-scale contribution table, so more people at higher incomes can get help paying for health insurance, with a zero-contribution floor at lower incomes.
- Population Scope Medium Removing the 400% FPL cap opens premium tax credits to households above that threshold — a substantial but not majority share of the U.S. population, likely in the 10–25% range of individuals purchasing or potentially purchasing individual-market coverage.
- Budgetary Magnitude High Extending a mandatory federal tax credit to all income levels above the former cap creates open-ended, recurring Treasury expenditures with no dollar ceiling, representing a major expansion of federal tax spending.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Strikes an existing statutory eligibility ceiling and replaces the contribution table in IRC Section 36B, creating a newly enforceable entitlement to premium tax credits for a previously excluded population.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Low The eligibility expansion and new contribution percentages are set directly in statute, leaving the IRS no rulemaking discretion over the core eligibility or rate structure.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Low the IRS administers the expanded credit through existing Section 36B infrastructure, adding volume but no new enforcement mechanisms or compliance infrastructure.
- Temporal Commitment High Persists indefinitely until Congress acts to repeal or amend it.
No signal yet
Funding / Appropriations Top 5
Extend and increase FMAP incentive for Medicaid expansion
Doubles the federal matching rate bonus and triples the bonus period for states that newly adopt Medicaid expansion, significantly increasing federal financial support to encourage holdout states to expand coverage.
- Population Scope Low Directly affects only the small set of state governments that have not yet expanded Medicaid — roughly ten jurisdictions — though millions of low-income adults would gain coverage if those states act.
- Budgetary Magnitude High Doubles the matching rate bonus to 10 percentage points and extends it to six years, committing potentially tens of billions in additional federal Medicaid matching funds if multiple states expand.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Amends Social Security Act Section 1905(ii) to impose a new statutory federal funding commitment of substantially greater magnitude, creating a binding financial obligation contingent on state action.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Low The bonus rate and duration are fixed in statute; Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) applies the formula mechanically with no delegated discretion over the core terms.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Low CMS administers enhanced FMAP through existing matching-payment infrastructure; no new enforcement mechanism or compliance process is required.
- Temporal Commitment High Persists indefinitely until Congress acts to repeal or amend it, though the bonus itself runs 24 quarters from each qualifying state's start date.
No signal yet
Implementation & Enforcement Top 5
Anti-fraud penalties and verification for marketplace enrollments
Creates civil and criminal penalties for insurance agents and brokers who submit false or fraudulent health insurance marketplace enrollment applications, and requires a federal verification process for agent-assisted enrollments including enrollee consent and notifications.
- Population Scope Low Directly regulates insurance agents and brokers operating on ACA marketplaces — a defined professional class, not a broad share of the general population.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low No appropriation or authorization of funds is provided; penalty revenues are incidental enforcement receipts, not a directed federal spending stream.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Creates new statutory civil and criminal liability for a regulated professional class and imposes a mandatory federal verification infrastructure on federally operated exchanges, establishing binding legal obligations that did not previously exist.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Medium The verification process must be established by January 1, 2029, with specified elements, but federally operated exchanges retain discretion over how to design and implement the consent, notification, and reporting systems.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden High Requires standing up a new federal verification infrastructure for agent-assisted enrollments and creates ongoing case-by-case civil and criminal adjudication obligations for the enforcement authority.
- Temporal Commitment High Persists indefinitely until Congress acts to repeal or amend it.
No signal yet
Core Policy Mechanism Top 5
Repeal of four reconciliation health law sections
Repeals four sections of a recent federal budget law affecting health care and restores prior law as if those sections had never been enacted, reversing whatever changes those provisions made.
- Population Scope Medium The four repealed sections (71107, 71112, 71119, 71120) of Public Law 119-21 are health-related provisions of a major reconciliation law, suggesting a broad affected population, though the exact scope cannot be confirmed from available text.
- Budgetary Magnitude Medium Repealing reconciliation health provisions likely reverses associated spending cuts or offsets, with fiscal consequences that could be substantial but are unquantifiable without knowing the content of the repealed sections.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Strikes four enacted statutory sections and mandates that all downstream laws and regulations be applied as if they never existed, a retroactive restoration of prior substantive law.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Low The repeal and restoration are automatic and self-executing by statute, granting no agency discretion over implementation.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Low No new enforcement mechanism is created; prior law is restored automatically without requiring new administrative infrastructure.
- Temporal Commitment High Same as above.
No signal yet
Core Policy Mechanism Top 5
Premium tax credit for Medicaid coverage gap individuals
Extends ACA premium tax credits to people in states that have not expanded Medicaid whose income is below the federal poverty line, providing them with fully subsidized marketplace health insurance they currently cannot access.
- Population Scope Low Targets only individuals below 100% FPL in the roughly ten non-Medicaid-expansion states — a narrow subset of the U.S. population, well under 10%.
- Budgetary Magnitude Medium Creates fully subsidized marketplace coverage (0% required contribution) for a previously excluded population, generating new recurring federal tax expenditures, but the eligible pool is geographically and income-bounded, constraining total outlay.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Creates a new statutory eligibility category in IRC Section 36B that confers an enforceable entitlement to fully subsidized coverage where no such right previously existed.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Low Eligibility criteria and the 0% contribution rate are fixed in statute, leaving the IRS no discretion over coverage terms for this population.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Low the IRS administers through existing Section 36B mechanisms; the new category adds verification of state non-expansion status but no new enforcement infrastructure.
- Temporal Commitment High Same as above.
No signal yet
Regulatory or Legal Changes
Codify ACA open enrollment dates in statute
Locks ACA marketplace open enrollment dates into federal law — running from November 1 through January 15 each year starting in 2026 — so they can no longer be changed by agency regulation alone.
No signal yet
Regulatory or Legal Changes
Codify ACA open enrollment dates in statute
Locks ACA marketplace open enrollment dates into federal law — running from November 1 through January 15 each year starting in 2026 — so they can no longer be changed by agency regulation alone.
No signal yet
Summary
The Healthy Communities Act of 2026 expands access to health insurance by broadening eligibility for the Affordable Care Act (ACA) premium tax credit and strengthening Medicaid coverage options. Among other elements, the bill * removes the income cap on ACA premium tax credit eligibility, allowing more people to get help paying for health insurance; * provides fully subsidized marketplace coverage to people in states that have not expanded Medicaid who would otherwise fall into a coverage gap; * increases federal financial incentives for states to adopt Medicaid expansion; * repeals several health-related provisions from a recent budget reconciliation law; * locks ACA open enrollment dates into federal law; and * creates new penalties and a verification process to prevent fraud by insurance agents and brokers.
AI-generated summary, pending human review.
| Version | Event | Date | User support | Your vote | Roll calls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Original |
Initial publication
Oct 5, 2026
|
Oct 5, 2026 | No votes yet | — | — |
Log in or create an account to record your vote on this legislation. Results are visible to all visitors.
Core Policy Mechanism Top 5
Expand premium tax credit eligibility, revise contribution table
Removes the income ceiling on ACA marketplace premium tax credits and replaces the sliding-scale contribution table, so more people at higher incomes can get help paying for health insurance, with a zero-contribution floor at lower incomes.
- Population Scope Medium Removing the 400% FPL cap opens premium tax credits to households above that threshold — a substantial but not majority share of the U.S. population, likely in the 10–25% range of individuals purchasing or potentially purchasing individual-market coverage.
- Budgetary Magnitude High Extending a mandatory federal tax credit to all income levels above the former cap creates open-ended, recurring Treasury expenditures with no dollar ceiling, representing a major expansion of federal tax spending.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Strikes an existing statutory eligibility ceiling and replaces the contribution table in IRC Section 36B, creating a newly enforceable entitlement to premium tax credits for a previously excluded population.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Low The eligibility expansion and new contribution percentages are set directly in statute, leaving the IRS no rulemaking discretion over the core eligibility or rate structure.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Low the IRS administers the expanded credit through existing Section 36B infrastructure, adding volume but no new enforcement mechanisms or compliance infrastructure.
- Temporal Commitment High Persists indefinitely until Congress acts to repeal or amend it.
No signal yet
Core Policy Mechanism
Expand premium tax credit eligibility, revise contribution table
Funding / Appropriations Top 5
Extend and increase FMAP incentive for Medicaid expansion
Doubles the federal matching rate bonus and triples the bonus period for states that newly adopt Medicaid expansion, significantly increasing federal financial support to encourage holdout states to expand coverage.
- Population Scope Low Directly affects only the small set of state governments that have not yet expanded Medicaid — roughly ten jurisdictions — though millions of low-income adults would gain coverage if those states act.
- Budgetary Magnitude High Doubles the matching rate bonus to 10 percentage points and extends it to six years, committing potentially tens of billions in additional federal Medicaid matching funds if multiple states expand.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Amends Social Security Act Section 1905(ii) to impose a new statutory federal funding commitment of substantially greater magnitude, creating a binding financial obligation contingent on state action.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Low The bonus rate and duration are fixed in statute; Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) applies the formula mechanically with no delegated discretion over the core terms.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Low CMS administers enhanced FMAP through existing matching-payment infrastructure; no new enforcement mechanism or compliance process is required.
- Temporal Commitment High Persists indefinitely until Congress acts to repeal or amend it, though the bonus itself runs 24 quarters from each qualifying state's start date.
No signal yet
Funding / Appropriations
Extend and increase FMAP incentive for Medicaid expansion
Implementation & Enforcement Top 5
Anti-fraud penalties and verification for marketplace enrollments
Creates civil and criminal penalties for insurance agents and brokers who submit false or fraudulent health insurance marketplace enrollment applications, and requires a federal verification process for agent-assisted enrollments including enrollee consent and notifications.
- Population Scope Low Directly regulates insurance agents and brokers operating on ACA marketplaces — a defined professional class, not a broad share of the general population.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low No appropriation or authorization of funds is provided; penalty revenues are incidental enforcement receipts, not a directed federal spending stream.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Creates new statutory civil and criminal liability for a regulated professional class and imposes a mandatory federal verification infrastructure on federally operated exchanges, establishing binding legal obligations that did not previously exist.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Medium The verification process must be established by January 1, 2029, with specified elements, but federally operated exchanges retain discretion over how to design and implement the consent, notification, and reporting systems.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden High Requires standing up a new federal verification infrastructure for agent-assisted enrollments and creates ongoing case-by-case civil and criminal adjudication obligations for the enforcement authority.
- Temporal Commitment High Persists indefinitely until Congress acts to repeal or amend it.
No signal yet
Implementation & Enforcement
Anti-fraud penalties and verification for marketplace enrollments
Core Policy Mechanism Top 5
Repeal of four reconciliation health law sections
Repeals four sections of a recent federal budget law affecting health care and restores prior law as if those sections had never been enacted, reversing whatever changes those provisions made.
- Population Scope Medium The four repealed sections (71107, 71112, 71119, 71120) of Public Law 119-21 are health-related provisions of a major reconciliation law, suggesting a broad affected population, though the exact scope cannot be confirmed from available text.
- Budgetary Magnitude Medium Repealing reconciliation health provisions likely reverses associated spending cuts or offsets, with fiscal consequences that could be substantial but are unquantifiable without knowing the content of the repealed sections.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Strikes four enacted statutory sections and mandates that all downstream laws and regulations be applied as if they never existed, a retroactive restoration of prior substantive law.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Low The repeal and restoration are automatic and self-executing by statute, granting no agency discretion over implementation.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Low No new enforcement mechanism is created; prior law is restored automatically without requiring new administrative infrastructure.
- Temporal Commitment High Same as above.
No signal yet
Core Policy Mechanism
Repeal of four reconciliation health law sections
Core Policy Mechanism Top 5
Premium tax credit for Medicaid coverage gap individuals
Extends ACA premium tax credits to people in states that have not expanded Medicaid whose income is below the federal poverty line, providing them with fully subsidized marketplace health insurance they currently cannot access.
- Population Scope Low Targets only individuals below 100% FPL in the roughly ten non-Medicaid-expansion states — a narrow subset of the U.S. population, well under 10%.
- Budgetary Magnitude Medium Creates fully subsidized marketplace coverage (0% required contribution) for a previously excluded population, generating new recurring federal tax expenditures, but the eligible pool is geographically and income-bounded, constraining total outlay.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Creates a new statutory eligibility category in IRC Section 36B that confers an enforceable entitlement to fully subsidized coverage where no such right previously existed.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Low Eligibility criteria and the 0% contribution rate are fixed in statute, leaving the IRS no discretion over coverage terms for this population.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Low the IRS administers through existing Section 36B mechanisms; the new category adds verification of state non-expansion status but no new enforcement infrastructure.
- Temporal Commitment High Same as above.
No signal yet
Core Policy Mechanism
Premium tax credit for Medicaid coverage gap individuals
Incomplete vote
You have not made a selection on all required items:
Choose Neutral if you prefer not to commit. Leaving without completing will remove all your votes for this bill from the totals.
Maximum recommendations reached
You have already recommended the maximum number of components allowed on this bill. To recommend [new component], choose one of your current recommendations to unselect: