Full bill text rendering is coming soon.
In the meantime, read the full text on Congress.gov ↗.
Core Policy Mechanism Top 2
Update Critical Asset List for Golden Dome Defense System
Requires the Secretary of Defense to add Golden Dome missile defense assets — including space-based sensors, interceptors, ground-based facilities, and command systems — to the DoD Critical Asset List within 180 days.
- Population Scope Low The mandate directly binds the Secretary of Defense (DOD) and a narrow set of DoD planners and administrators responsible for the Critical Asset List, not the general public.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low No funds are authorized or appropriated; the provision imposes only a planning and listing obligation on DoD.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth Medium Creates a new statutory duty for the Secretary of Defense to update a specific administrative list on a defined timeline, constraining existing agency discretion over how the Critical Asset List is maintained rather than altering substantive law.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Medium The Secretary of Defense must include specified asset categories but retains discretion under subsection (c)(2)(D) to add other assets 'deemed essential,' leaving meaningful judgment over the list's scope.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Low Compliance requires an internal DoD administrative update with no new enforcement mechanism, penalty structure, or external compliance obligation.
- Temporal Commitment High Once the Critical Asset List is updated, the statutory obligation to maintain Golden Dome assets on it persists indefinitely with no sunset, expiry, or mandatory reauthorization.
No signal yet
Core Policy Mechanism Top 2
Synchronize Defended Asset List with Golden Dome Requirements
Requires the Secretary of Defense to revise the Defended Asset List at the same time as the Critical Asset List update, prioritizing Golden Dome assets based on mission criticality, threat assessments, and available defensive resources.
- Population Scope Low The requirement directly affects the Secretary of Defense (DOD) and joint force commanders responsible for missile defense resource allocation — a narrow governmental population.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low No funds are authorized or appropriated; the provision imposes only a planning and prioritization obligation on DoD.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth Medium Creates a new statutory duty to revise the Defended Asset List concurrently with the Critical Asset List update and to apply specified prioritization criteria, constraining existing DoD discretion over resource-allocation planning without altering substantive law.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Medium The Secretary of Defense must consult joint force commanders and apply three statutory prioritization criteria, but retains judgment over how those criteria are weighted and which specific assets are elevated.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Low Compliance consists of an internal DoD list revision coordinated across command levels, with no new enforcement infrastructure, penalties, or external compliance obligations.
- Temporal Commitment High The requirement to keep the Defended Asset List aligned with Golden Dome operational requirements carries no sunset or reauthorization trigger, persisting indefinitely unless Congress acts.
No signal yet
No possible riders have been surfaced for this bill.
Summary
This bill directs the Secretary of Defense (DOD) to update DOD Critical Asset List to include facilities and systems needed to build, deploy, and run the Golden Dome missile defense system, which is designed to protect the United States from ballistic, hypersonic, and cruise missile attacks. The bill also requires the DoD to align the Defended Asset List with those updates and to report to Congress on the changes, risks, and protection plans within 270 days.
AI-generated summary, pending human review.
| Version | Event | Date | User support | Your vote | Roll calls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Original |
Initial publication
Oct 6, 2026
|
Oct 6, 2026 | No votes yet | — | — |
Log in or create an account to record your vote on this legislation. Results are visible to all visitors.
Core Policy Mechanism Top 2
Update Critical Asset List for Golden Dome Defense System
Requires the Secretary of Defense to add Golden Dome missile defense assets — including space-based sensors, interceptors, ground-based facilities, and command systems — to the DoD Critical Asset List within 180 days.
- Population Scope Low The mandate directly binds the Secretary of Defense (DOD) and a narrow set of DoD planners and administrators responsible for the Critical Asset List, not the general public.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low No funds are authorized or appropriated; the provision imposes only a planning and listing obligation on DoD.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth Medium Creates a new statutory duty for the Secretary of Defense to update a specific administrative list on a defined timeline, constraining existing agency discretion over how the Critical Asset List is maintained rather than altering substantive law.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Medium The Secretary of Defense must include specified asset categories but retains discretion under subsection (c)(2)(D) to add other assets 'deemed essential,' leaving meaningful judgment over the list's scope.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Low Compliance requires an internal DoD administrative update with no new enforcement mechanism, penalty structure, or external compliance obligation.
- Temporal Commitment High Once the Critical Asset List is updated, the statutory obligation to maintain Golden Dome assets on it persists indefinitely with no sunset, expiry, or mandatory reauthorization.
No signal yet
Core Policy Mechanism
Update Critical Asset List for Golden Dome Defense System
Core Policy Mechanism Top 2
Synchronize Defended Asset List with Golden Dome Requirements
Requires the Secretary of Defense to revise the Defended Asset List at the same time as the Critical Asset List update, prioritizing Golden Dome assets based on mission criticality, threat assessments, and available defensive resources.
- Population Scope Low The requirement directly affects the Secretary of Defense (DOD) and joint force commanders responsible for missile defense resource allocation — a narrow governmental population.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low No funds are authorized or appropriated; the provision imposes only a planning and prioritization obligation on DoD.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth Medium Creates a new statutory duty to revise the Defended Asset List concurrently with the Critical Asset List update and to apply specified prioritization criteria, constraining existing DoD discretion over resource-allocation planning without altering substantive law.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Medium The Secretary of Defense must consult joint force commanders and apply three statutory prioritization criteria, but retains judgment over how those criteria are weighted and which specific assets are elevated.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Low Compliance consists of an internal DoD list revision coordinated across command levels, with no new enforcement infrastructure, penalties, or external compliance obligations.
- Temporal Commitment High The requirement to keep the Defended Asset List aligned with Golden Dome operational requirements carries no sunset or reauthorization trigger, persisting indefinitely unless Congress acts.
No signal yet
Core Policy Mechanism
Synchronize Defended Asset List with Golden Dome Requirements
Incomplete vote
You have not made a selection on all required items:
Choose Neutral if you prefer not to commit. Leaving without completing will remove all your votes for this bill from the totals.
Maximum recommendations reached
You have already recommended the maximum number of components allowed on this bill. To recommend [new component], choose one of your current recommendations to unselect: