Full bill text rendering is coming soon.
In the meantime, read the full text on Congress.gov ↗.
Regulatory or Legal Changes Top 2
Financial Management and Fraud Checks in MEP Evaluations
Expands required evaluations of Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) centers to include assessment of financial management practices and monitoring for potential fraud and misuse of federal funds. Bars the government from suspending, canceling, or declining to renew funding for a Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) center except through the formal evaluation process, protecting centers from arbitrary adverse action. Requires the government to use cooperative agreements with Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) centers, changing a discretionary 'may' to a mandatory 'shall,' making the funding relationship legally binding rather than optional. Tightens the probation process for underperforming Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) centers by setting a firm 180-day deadline for reevaluation and requiring—rather than permitting—further action if a center fails to improve.
- Population Scope Low Directly affects only the roughly 50-60 MEP centers nationwide and their federal overseers at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), a very narrow set of entities.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low No new funds are authorized or appropriated; provisions add oversight and procedural requirements within existing MEP funding structures.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth Medium Converts discretionary agency authority into mandatory obligations and adds new evaluation criteria, binding NIST's conduct rather than altering the underlying substantive rights of the regulated population.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Low The bill systematically replaces 'may' with 'shall' and adds firm deadlines, sharply constraining rather than expanding NIST's discretion across evaluation, probation, and adverse-action decisions.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Medium Adds recurring case-by-case compliance obligations — financial management audits, fraud monitoring, and timed reevaluation cycles — requiring ongoing administrative infrastructure at NIST.
- Temporal Commitment High Amendments to a permanent statute with no expiry or reauthorization requirement bind future Congresses and NIST indefinitely.
No signal yet
Core Policy Mechanism Top 2
Mandatory Competition to Replace Failing MEP Centers
Requires the government to hold a competitive selection process to replace any Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) center that fails probation or loses its funding, with strict deadlines for launching and completing the competition.
- Population Scope Low Directly affects only failing or defunded MEP centers, prospective replacement operators, and manufacturers served by those specific centers — a narrow subset of an already small program.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low No new funds are authorized; the provision only redirects already-allocated MEP financial assistance to a replacement operator, leaving total program spending unchanged.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth Medium Creates new mandatory procedural duties — required competition, fixed application windows, and a selection deadline — that constrain National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)'s conduct without altering the substantive rights of the broader regulated population.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Low Replaces NIST's previously optional remedial authority with mandatory, time-bound competitive replacement, leaving no discretion to forgo the competition once a failure determination is made.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Medium Requires NIST to stand up and administer a formal competitive selection process — with application periods, review, and selection — each time a center fails or loses funding, imposing recurring adjudicatory load.
- Temporal Commitment High As a permanent amendment to 15 U.S.C. § 278K with no sunset or reauthorization trigger, it persists indefinitely unless Congress affirmatively acts to repeal it.
No signal yet
No possible riders have been surfaced for this bill.
Summary
This bill tightens how the federal government oversees the Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP), a program that helps small and medium-sized manufacturers improve their operations. It requires the government to use cooperative agreements with MEP centers, adds financial management and fraud checks to center reviews, sets firm deadlines for putting struggling centers on probation and replacing them if they don't improve, and limits the government's ability to take adverse action against a center outside of the formal review process.
AI-generated summary, pending human review.
| Version | Event | Date | User support | Your vote | Roll calls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Original |
Initial publication
Jul 13, 2026
|
Jul 13, 2026 | No votes yet | — | — |
Log in or create an account to record your vote on this legislation. Results are visible to all visitors.
Regulatory or Legal Changes Top 2
Financial Management and Fraud Checks in MEP Evaluations
Expands required evaluations of Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) centers to include assessment of financial management practices and monitoring for potential fraud and misuse of federal funds. Bars the government from suspending, canceling, or declining to renew funding for a Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) center except through the formal evaluation process, protecting centers from arbitrary adverse action. Requires the government to use cooperative agreements with Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) centers, changing a discretionary 'may' to a mandatory 'shall,' making the funding relationship legally binding rather than optional. Tightens the probation process for underperforming Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) centers by setting a firm 180-day deadline for reevaluation and requiring—rather than permitting—further action if a center fails to improve.
- Population Scope Low Directly affects only the roughly 50-60 MEP centers nationwide and their federal overseers at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), a very narrow set of entities.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low No new funds are authorized or appropriated; provisions add oversight and procedural requirements within existing MEP funding structures.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth Medium Converts discretionary agency authority into mandatory obligations and adds new evaluation criteria, binding NIST's conduct rather than altering the underlying substantive rights of the regulated population.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Low The bill systematically replaces 'may' with 'shall' and adds firm deadlines, sharply constraining rather than expanding NIST's discretion across evaluation, probation, and adverse-action decisions.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Medium Adds recurring case-by-case compliance obligations — financial management audits, fraud monitoring, and timed reevaluation cycles — requiring ongoing administrative infrastructure at NIST.
- Temporal Commitment High Amendments to a permanent statute with no expiry or reauthorization requirement bind future Congresses and NIST indefinitely.
No signal yet
Regulatory or Legal Changes
Financial Management and Fraud Checks in MEP Evaluations
Core Policy Mechanism Top 2
Mandatory Competition to Replace Failing MEP Centers
Requires the government to hold a competitive selection process to replace any Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) center that fails probation or loses its funding, with strict deadlines for launching and completing the competition.
- Population Scope Low Directly affects only failing or defunded MEP centers, prospective replacement operators, and manufacturers served by those specific centers — a narrow subset of an already small program.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low No new funds are authorized; the provision only redirects already-allocated MEP financial assistance to a replacement operator, leaving total program spending unchanged.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth Medium Creates new mandatory procedural duties — required competition, fixed application windows, and a selection deadline — that constrain National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)'s conduct without altering the substantive rights of the broader regulated population.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Low Replaces NIST's previously optional remedial authority with mandatory, time-bound competitive replacement, leaving no discretion to forgo the competition once a failure determination is made.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Medium Requires NIST to stand up and administer a formal competitive selection process — with application periods, review, and selection — each time a center fails or loses funding, imposing recurring adjudicatory load.
- Temporal Commitment High As a permanent amendment to 15 U.S.C. § 278K with no sunset or reauthorization trigger, it persists indefinitely unless Congress affirmatively acts to repeal it.
No signal yet
Core Policy Mechanism
Mandatory Competition to Replace Failing MEP Centers
Incomplete vote
You have not made a selection on all required items:
Choose Neutral if you prefer not to commit. Leaving without completing will remove all your votes for this bill from the totals.
Maximum recommendations reached
You have already recommended the maximum number of components allowed on this bill. To recommend [new component], choose one of your current recommendations to unselect: