S 5470 — 119th Congress

Protecting our Students in Schools Act of 2026

Introduced Sep 23, 2026 Open for voting
Note: Bill summaries and components on this page are AI-generated and may contain errors. Always consult the original bill text and official sources before relying on this information.
← Open legislation
Click Vote to enable simultaneous voting.

Implementation & Enforcement Top 5

OCR complaint investigation and fund-withholding enforcement

Requires the Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights (OCR) to investigate corporal punishment complaints and authorizes withholding federal funds, compliance agreements, or cease-and-desist orders against noncompliant schools. Schools that fix violations within a year get withheld funds back.

  • Population Scope High Applies to every federally funded school and program nationwide, encompassing virtually all public K-12 institutions and the state educational agencies overseeing them.
  • Budgetary Magnitude Medium Authorizes withholding of existing federal education payments to noncompliant programs and states, with restoration required upon cure — a recurring conditional mechanism affecting significant but unspecified federal funding streams.
  • Legal / Regulatory Depth High Creates new binding enforcement duties for the Secretary of Education and Office for Civil Rights (OCR), including mandatory fund-withholding authority tied to a specific new prohibition — a substantive expansion of federal civil rights enforcement infrastructure.
  • Degree of Discretion Granted Low The Secretary of Education must carry out at least one of three specified enforcement actions against noncompliant programs; while there is limited choice among tools, action itself is mandatory.
  • Implementation & Enforcement Burden High Requires OCR to stand up new complaint intake infrastructure within 90 days and then conduct ongoing investigations and enforcement actions across all federally funded schools nationwide.
  • Temporal Commitment High Enforcement obligations are permanent from enactment with no scheduled sunset or reauthorization, binding OCR and the Secretary of Education indefinitely.
No signal yet

Regulatory or Legal Changes Top 5

Ban on corporal punishment in federally funded schools

Prohibits physical discipline of students in any school or program receiving federal money. Students or parents can sue in federal or state court for damages, attorneys' fees, and court orders to stop violations.

  • Population Scope High Virtually all U.S. public school students — well over 25% of the population — attend federally funded schools and are directly protected by this prohibition.
  • Budgetary Magnitude Low The prohibition itself neither authorizes nor appropriates funds; budgetary consequences arise only through separate enforcement provisions.
  • Legal / Regulatory Depth High Creates a new federal statutory prohibition with binding nationwide effect and a new private right of action — both substantive changes to the legal landscape for millions of students and covered programs.
  • Degree of Discretion Granted Low The prohibition is absolute ('shall not subject'), and the private right of action arises by statute; no agency discretion governs whether the ban applies.
  • Implementation & Enforcement Burden High Generates recurring federal and state court litigation through the private right of action, requiring schools to defend against suits for compensatory damages, injunctive relief, and fees on a case-by-case basis.
  • Temporal Commitment High Operates indefinitely from enactment with no expiry or reauthorization trigger, persisting until Congress affirmatively repeals it.
No signal yet

Funding / Appropriations Top 5

Grant program for school climate improvement

Creates a federal grant program for states and school districts to reduce suspensions, expulsions, and physical discipline in public schools by funding staff training, behavioral intervention programs, and research. Grants last three years and prioritize schools with the highest rates of exclusionary discipline.

  • Population Scope High Targets state and local educational agencies nationwide, with downstream benefits for students in public elementary and secondary schools — a population exceeding 50 million students.
  • Budgetary Magnitude Medium Establishes a new competitive grant program funded from appropriations authorized beginning FY2027 with no specified dollar cap; magnitude is discretionary and depends on future appropriations action.
  • Legal / Regulatory Depth High Creates a new federal competitive grant program with eligibility criteria, priority rules, required activities, and a multi-level state-to-local subgrant authority — a new statutory funding entitlement structure.
  • Degree of Discretion Granted Medium The Secretary of Education 'may' award grants and sets priorities and application requirements, retaining meaningful discretion in selection, while required activities for recipients are mandatory.
  • Implementation & Enforcement Burden Medium Requires the Secretary of Education to administer a competitive grant cycle with application review, priority determinations, subgrant oversight, and reapplication assessment tied to disaggregated performance data.
  • Temporal Commitment High Grant authority runs indefinitely from FY2027 with no expiry or reauthorization requirement, persisting until Congress acts to terminate or modify it.
No signal yet

Regulatory or Legal Changes Top 5

State reporting and compliance assurance requirements

Requires state education agencies receiving federal funds to submit written compliance assurances and school climate reports describing discipline policies and positive behavioral intervention plans. States that fail to comply face fund withholding or cease-and-desist orders.

  • Population Scope High Reaches all 50 state educational agencies and their constituent local educational agencies, encompassing the full universe of public school governance structures nationwide.
  • Budgetary Magnitude Medium Conditions existing federal education funding on compliance, authorizing withholding from noncompliant state educational agencies and requiring restoration upon cure — a recurring conditional funding mechanism of significant but unquantified scale.
  • Legal / Regulatory Depth Medium Creates new procedural reporting and assurance obligations on state and local agencies — binding agency conduct through written submissions and disclosure duties rather than changing substantive disciplinary law.
  • Degree of Discretion Granted Low Submission of assurances and climate reports is mandatory; enforcement tools are mandatory upon noncompliance, leaving the Secretary of Education with limited discretion only in choosing among the three specified enforcement instruments.
  • Implementation & Enforcement Burden High Creates a multi-tier reporting chain — local to state to federal — plus Secretary enforcement authority, generating substantial recurring compliance and oversight workload across all state and local education agencies.
  • Temporal Commitment High Reporting and assurance obligations continue indefinitely with no scheduled sunset or reauthorization, binding state agencies permanently absent congressional action.
No signal yet

Funding / Appropriations Top 5

Open-ended appropriations authorization starting FY2027

Authorizes Congress to appropriate whatever funds are needed to carry out the bill starting in fiscal year 2027 and in every year after. No specific dollar amount is set; actual funding levels will be determined by future appropriations bills.

  • Population Scope High Provides the legal basis for funding all Act activities — enforcement, grants, and administration — ultimately affecting the full universe of federally funded schools and their students nationwide.
  • Budgetary Magnitude Medium Authorizes 'such sums as necessary' beginning FY2027 with no cap or floor; actual magnitude is discretionary and determined by annual appropriations, making it potentially significant but unquantified.
  • Legal / Regulatory Depth Low Provides the statutory authorization predicate for future appropriations without itself creating any new substantive right, duty, or enforcement mechanism.
  • Degree of Discretion Granted High Leaves all funding levels entirely to Congress's annual discretion with no mandatory minimum, maximum, or formula constraining future appropriations decisions.
  • Implementation & Enforcement Burden Low Creates no enforcement mechanism or compliance obligation; burden consequences flow from the substantive provisions the appropriations enable, not from this authorization itself.
  • Temporal Commitment High Authorization runs from FY2027 into every subsequent fiscal year with no expiry, remaining in effect indefinitely unless Congress acts to limit or repeal it.
No signal yet

Regulatory or Legal Changes

24-hour parent and agency notification requirement

Requires schools to notify parents, state education officials, and local law enforcement in writing within 24 hours whenever a student is physically disciplined. For students with disabilities, schools must also notify the relevant protection and advocacy system.

  • Population Scope High Obligates every federally funded school nationwide, and notification rights flow to parents of any student subjected to corporal punishment — a population spanning virtually all public school families.
  • Budgetary Magnitude Low Imposes no funding authorization or appropriation; it is a procedural obligation with no direct budgetary effect.
  • Legal / Regulatory Depth Medium Creates a new mandatory procedural duty — written notification within 24 hours to multiple parties — that binds school conduct without changing the underlying substantive prohibition.
  • Degree of Discretion Granted Low Notification is mandatory ('shall notify') within a fixed 24-hour window; no agency or school discretion governs whether or when to comply.
  • Implementation & Enforcement Burden Medium Imposes an affirmative compliance obligation on school administrators after every incident, including additional disability-specific notifications, creating recurring operational demands.
  • Temporal Commitment High Applies indefinitely from enactment with no expiry, binding schools permanently unless Congress acts to modify or repeal it.
No signal yet

Carve-outs, Exemptions, Eligibility

Private school and home school exemptions from Act

Exempts private schools that do not receive federal funds from the bill's requirements. Completely exempts home schools regardless of how states classify them, and clarifies that home-schooling parents are not covered by the bill's rules on school personnel.

  • Population Scope Medium Directly affects private school operators and approximately 5-7 million home-schooled students plus their families — a meaningful but sub-25% share of the U.S. school-age population.
  • Budgetary Magnitude Low Neither authorizes nor appropriates funds; defines the Act's boundaries without any direct budgetary consequence.
  • Legal / Regulatory Depth Medium Independently constrains the Act's statutory reach by carving out entire categories of educational settings, limiting the scope of the new prohibition as a matter of law.
  • Degree of Discretion Granted Low Exemptions are categorical and self-executing; no agency discretion governs whether private or home schools fall outside the Act's requirements.
  • Implementation & Enforcement Burden Low Reduces rather than creates enforcement burden by removing two categories of schools from the Act's compliance and oversight requirements entirely.
  • Temporal Commitment High Exemptions apply indefinitely from enactment with no scheduled review or sunset, permanently limiting the Act's reach absent congressional modification.
No signal yet

Implementation & Enforcement

AG civil suit authority for corporal punishment violations

Authorizes the Attorney General (AG) to sue schools in federal court on behalf of parents who complain of corporal punishment violations. The AG must notify the school and give it time to fix the problem before filing suit.

No signal yet

Regulatory or Legal Changes

180-day rulemaking requirement with negotiated process

Requires the Secretary of Education to issue implementing regulations within 180 days of enactment using a formal negotiated rulemaking process, setting a firm deadline and procedural requirement for how the rules must be developed.

No signal yet

Regulatory or Legal Changes

DoD and Interior school compliance extension

Extends the bill's corporal punishment rules to schools operated or funded by the Department of Defense (DoD) and the Department of the Interior (DoI), requiring the heads of those agencies to ensure compliance with all Act regulations.

No signal yet

Implementation & Enforcement

AG civil suit authority for corporal punishment violations

Authorizes the Attorney General (AG) to sue schools in federal court on behalf of parents who complain of corporal punishment violations. The AG must notify the school and give it time to fix the problem before filing suit.

No signal yet

Regulatory or Legal Changes

180-day rulemaking requirement with negotiated process

Requires the Secretary of Education to issue implementing regulations within 180 days of enactment using a formal negotiated rulemaking process, setting a firm deadline and procedural requirement for how the rules must be developed.

No signal yet

Regulatory or Legal Changes

DoD and Interior school compliance extension

Extends the bill's corporal punishment rules to schools operated or funded by the Department of Defense (DoD) and the Department of the Interior (DoI), requiring the heads of those agencies to ensure compliance with all Act regulations.

No signal yet

Summary

This bill bans corporal punishment — physical discipline — in schools that receive federal money. It covers public schools and other federally funded education programs, including schools run by the Department of Defense (DOD) and the Department of the Interior (DOI). Among other elements, the bill * bans corporal punishment in all federally funded schools and gives students or parents the right to sue for damages; * allows the Attorney General (AG) to file civil suits against schools that violate the ban; * requires Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights (OCR) to investigate complaints and can cut federal funding to noncompliant schools; * mandates that schools notify parents, state agencies, and local law enforcement within 24 hours of any corporal punishment incident; * creates a competitive grant program for states and school districts to improve school climate and reduce exclusionary discipline like suspensions and expulsions; * and requires states to submit written assurances and school climate reports to the federal government.

AI-generated summary, pending human review.

Full bill text rendering is coming soon.

In the meantime, read the full text on Congress.gov ↗.

Version Event Date User support Your vote Roll calls
Original
Initial publication
Sep 23, 2026
Sep 23, 2026 No votes yet — —

Implementation & Enforcement Top 5

OCR complaint investigation and fund-withholding enforcement

Requires the Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights (OCR) to investigate corporal punishment complaints and authorizes withholding federal funds, compliance agreements, or cease-and-desist orders against noncompliant schools. Schools that fix violations within a year get withheld funds back.

  • Population Scope High Applies to every federally funded school and program nationwide, encompassing virtually all public K-12 institutions and the state educational agencies overseeing them.
  • Budgetary Magnitude Medium Authorizes withholding of existing federal education payments to noncompliant programs and states, with restoration required upon cure — a recurring conditional mechanism affecting significant but unspecified federal funding streams.
  • Legal / Regulatory Depth High Creates new binding enforcement duties for the Secretary of Education and Office for Civil Rights (OCR), including mandatory fund-withholding authority tied to a specific new prohibition — a substantive expansion of federal civil rights enforcement infrastructure.
  • Degree of Discretion Granted Low The Secretary of Education must carry out at least one of three specified enforcement actions against noncompliant programs; while there is limited choice among tools, action itself is mandatory.
  • Implementation & Enforcement Burden High Requires OCR to stand up new complaint intake infrastructure within 90 days and then conduct ongoing investigations and enforcement actions across all federally funded schools nationwide.
  • Temporal Commitment High Enforcement obligations are permanent from enactment with no scheduled sunset or reauthorization, binding OCR and the Secretary of Education indefinitely.
No signal yet

Implementation & Enforcement

OCR complaint investigation and fund-withholding enforcement

Regulatory or Legal Changes Top 5

Ban on corporal punishment in federally funded schools

Prohibits physical discipline of students in any school or program receiving federal money. Students or parents can sue in federal or state court for damages, attorneys' fees, and court orders to stop violations.

  • Population Scope High Virtually all U.S. public school students — well over 25% of the population — attend federally funded schools and are directly protected by this prohibition.
  • Budgetary Magnitude Low The prohibition itself neither authorizes nor appropriates funds; budgetary consequences arise only through separate enforcement provisions.
  • Legal / Regulatory Depth High Creates a new federal statutory prohibition with binding nationwide effect and a new private right of action — both substantive changes to the legal landscape for millions of students and covered programs.
  • Degree of Discretion Granted Low The prohibition is absolute ('shall not subject'), and the private right of action arises by statute; no agency discretion governs whether the ban applies.
  • Implementation & Enforcement Burden High Generates recurring federal and state court litigation through the private right of action, requiring schools to defend against suits for compensatory damages, injunctive relief, and fees on a case-by-case basis.
  • Temporal Commitment High Operates indefinitely from enactment with no expiry or reauthorization trigger, persisting until Congress affirmatively repeals it.
No signal yet

Regulatory or Legal Changes

Ban on corporal punishment in federally funded schools

Funding / Appropriations Top 5

Grant program for school climate improvement

Creates a federal grant program for states and school districts to reduce suspensions, expulsions, and physical discipline in public schools by funding staff training, behavioral intervention programs, and research. Grants last three years and prioritize schools with the highest rates of exclusionary discipline.

  • Population Scope High Targets state and local educational agencies nationwide, with downstream benefits for students in public elementary and secondary schools — a population exceeding 50 million students.
  • Budgetary Magnitude Medium Establishes a new competitive grant program funded from appropriations authorized beginning FY2027 with no specified dollar cap; magnitude is discretionary and depends on future appropriations action.
  • Legal / Regulatory Depth High Creates a new federal competitive grant program with eligibility criteria, priority rules, required activities, and a multi-level state-to-local subgrant authority — a new statutory funding entitlement structure.
  • Degree of Discretion Granted Medium The Secretary of Education 'may' award grants and sets priorities and application requirements, retaining meaningful discretion in selection, while required activities for recipients are mandatory.
  • Implementation & Enforcement Burden Medium Requires the Secretary of Education to administer a competitive grant cycle with application review, priority determinations, subgrant oversight, and reapplication assessment tied to disaggregated performance data.
  • Temporal Commitment High Grant authority runs indefinitely from FY2027 with no expiry or reauthorization requirement, persisting until Congress acts to terminate or modify it.
No signal yet

Funding / Appropriations

Grant program for school climate improvement

Regulatory or Legal Changes Top 5

State reporting and compliance assurance requirements

Requires state education agencies receiving federal funds to submit written compliance assurances and school climate reports describing discipline policies and positive behavioral intervention plans. States that fail to comply face fund withholding or cease-and-desist orders.

  • Population Scope High Reaches all 50 state educational agencies and their constituent local educational agencies, encompassing the full universe of public school governance structures nationwide.
  • Budgetary Magnitude Medium Conditions existing federal education funding on compliance, authorizing withholding from noncompliant state educational agencies and requiring restoration upon cure — a recurring conditional funding mechanism of significant but unquantified scale.
  • Legal / Regulatory Depth Medium Creates new procedural reporting and assurance obligations on state and local agencies — binding agency conduct through written submissions and disclosure duties rather than changing substantive disciplinary law.
  • Degree of Discretion Granted Low Submission of assurances and climate reports is mandatory; enforcement tools are mandatory upon noncompliance, leaving the Secretary of Education with limited discretion only in choosing among the three specified enforcement instruments.
  • Implementation & Enforcement Burden High Creates a multi-tier reporting chain — local to state to federal — plus Secretary enforcement authority, generating substantial recurring compliance and oversight workload across all state and local education agencies.
  • Temporal Commitment High Reporting and assurance obligations continue indefinitely with no scheduled sunset or reauthorization, binding state agencies permanently absent congressional action.
No signal yet

Regulatory or Legal Changes

State reporting and compliance assurance requirements

Funding / Appropriations Top 5

Open-ended appropriations authorization starting FY2027

Authorizes Congress to appropriate whatever funds are needed to carry out the bill starting in fiscal year 2027 and in every year after. No specific dollar amount is set; actual funding levels will be determined by future appropriations bills.

  • Population Scope High Provides the legal basis for funding all Act activities — enforcement, grants, and administration — ultimately affecting the full universe of federally funded schools and their students nationwide.
  • Budgetary Magnitude Medium Authorizes 'such sums as necessary' beginning FY2027 with no cap or floor; actual magnitude is discretionary and determined by annual appropriations, making it potentially significant but unquantified.
  • Legal / Regulatory Depth Low Provides the statutory authorization predicate for future appropriations without itself creating any new substantive right, duty, or enforcement mechanism.
  • Degree of Discretion Granted High Leaves all funding levels entirely to Congress's annual discretion with no mandatory minimum, maximum, or formula constraining future appropriations decisions.
  • Implementation & Enforcement Burden Low Creates no enforcement mechanism or compliance obligation; burden consequences flow from the substantive provisions the appropriations enable, not from this authorization itself.
  • Temporal Commitment High Authorization runs from FY2027 into every subsequent fiscal year with no expiry, remaining in effect indefinitely unless Congress acts to limit or repeal it.
No signal yet

Funding / Appropriations

Open-ended appropriations authorization starting FY2027

Regulatory or Legal Changes

24-hour parent and agency notification requirement

Requires schools to notify parents, state education officials, and local law enforcement in writing within 24 hours whenever a student is physically disciplined. For students with disabilities, schools must also notify the relevant protection and advocacy system.

  • Population Scope High Obligates every federally funded school nationwide, and notification rights flow to parents of any student subjected to corporal punishment — a population spanning virtually all public school families.
  • Budgetary Magnitude Low Imposes no funding authorization or appropriation; it is a procedural obligation with no direct budgetary effect.
  • Legal / Regulatory Depth Medium Creates a new mandatory procedural duty — written notification within 24 hours to multiple parties — that binds school conduct without changing the underlying substantive prohibition.
  • Degree of Discretion Granted Low Notification is mandatory ('shall notify') within a fixed 24-hour window; no agency or school discretion governs whether or when to comply.
  • Implementation & Enforcement Burden Medium Imposes an affirmative compliance obligation on school administrators after every incident, including additional disability-specific notifications, creating recurring operational demands.
  • Temporal Commitment High Applies indefinitely from enactment with no expiry, binding schools permanently unless Congress acts to modify or repeal it.
No signal yet

Regulatory or Legal Changes (optional)

24-hour parent and agency notification requirement

Carve-outs, Exemptions, Eligibility

Private school and home school exemptions from Act

Exempts private schools that do not receive federal funds from the bill's requirements. Completely exempts home schools regardless of how states classify them, and clarifies that home-schooling parents are not covered by the bill's rules on school personnel.

  • Population Scope Medium Directly affects private school operators and approximately 5-7 million home-schooled students plus their families — a meaningful but sub-25% share of the U.S. school-age population.
  • Budgetary Magnitude Low Neither authorizes nor appropriates funds; defines the Act's boundaries without any direct budgetary consequence.
  • Legal / Regulatory Depth Medium Independently constrains the Act's statutory reach by carving out entire categories of educational settings, limiting the scope of the new prohibition as a matter of law.
  • Degree of Discretion Granted Low Exemptions are categorical and self-executing; no agency discretion governs whether private or home schools fall outside the Act's requirements.
  • Implementation & Enforcement Burden Low Reduces rather than creates enforcement burden by removing two categories of schools from the Act's compliance and oversight requirements entirely.
  • Temporal Commitment High Exemptions apply indefinitely from enactment with no scheduled review or sunset, permanently limiting the Act's reach absent congressional modification.
No signal yet

Carve-outs, Exemptions, Eligibility (optional)

Private school and home school exemptions from Act