Full bill text rendering is coming soon.
In the meantime, read the full text on Congress.gov ↗.
Regulatory or Legal Changes Top 4
Mandatory public disclosure rules for AI developers
Requires AI model developers to publicly disclose how their systems work, what safety protections exist for children and vulnerable users, what uses are allowed or banned, and how risks are evaluated — in formats readable by both consumers and researchers.
- Population Scope Medium Directly regulates AI model developers as a distinct industry class, with downstream effects on users including minors and vulnerable populations — a meaningful but bounded share of the public.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low No funds are authorized or appropriated by this provision.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Creates new statutory mandates requiring AI developers to publicly disclose specific categories of model information, imposing binding substantive obligations on a regulated class that did not previously exist under federal law.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Medium The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) must act within 150 days ('shall') but retains significant rulemaking discretion over the specific form, content, and standards of required disclosures.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden High Imposes an ongoing affirmative compliance obligation on AI developers — accurate, searchable, API-accessible dual-format disclosures — backed by FTC enforcement authority.
- Temporal Commitment High Persists indefinitely until Congress acts to repeal or modify it.
No signal yet
Regulatory or Legal Changes Top 4
Mandatory disclosure rules for AI deployers
Requires companies that deploy covered AI systems to the public to follow disclosure rules similar to those imposed on AI developers, ensuring transparency obligations extend across the AI supply chain beyond just model builders.
- Population Scope Medium Directly regulates covered AI deployers as a distinct class of supply-chain actors, with indirect effects on the broader public of users of deployed AI systems.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low Same as above.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Creates new statutory disclosure mandates on AI deployers — a previously unregulated class under federal law — extending substantive transparency obligations across the AI supply chain.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Medium The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) must issue rules within 150 days ('shall') but retains discretion to adapt developer-facing requirements as appropriate for the deployer context.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden High Imposes a new category of recurring affirmative compliance obligations on AI deployers, subject to FTC enforcement, where no such obligation previously existed.
- Temporal Commitment High Same as above.
No signal yet
Implementation & Enforcement Top 4
FTC enforcement authority and rulemaking mandate
Treats violations of the AI disclosure requirements as unfair or deceptive trade practices under existing consumer protection law, giving the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) authority to investigate, penalize, and issue implementing rules.
- Population Scope Low Directly affects AI developers and deployers as regulated entities — a narrow industry class — rather than the general public.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low Same as above.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Creates a new statutory enforcement basis by classifying AI disclosure violations as unfair or deceptive trade practices, a new enforceable prohibition activating the full range of Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Act penalties against a previously unregulated conduct category.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Low FTC must promulgate rules within one year ('shall') under standard notice-and-comment procedures, with enforcement authority defined by reference to existing FTC Act powers rather than newly delegated discretion.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden High Stands up a new enforcement infrastructure by routing AI disclosure noncompliance through existing FTC civil penalty and investigative machinery, generating recurring case-by-case adjudication demands.
- Temporal Commitment High Same as above.
No signal yet
Regulatory or Legal Changes Top 4
Model versioning guidance and coverage designation rules
Requires the FTC to issue guidance and binding rules on when an AI model counts as new versus updated, when a deployment qualifies as a covered entity, and when a model poses enough safety risk to warrant heightened oversight.
- Population Scope Low Directly affects AI developers and deployers of generative AI models subject to Federal Trade Commission (FTC) coverage thresholds — a narrow industry class.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low Same as above.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth Medium Establishes procedural rules — versioning guidance, coverage threshold criteria, and designation procedures with notice and response rights — that constrain agency conduct and define jurisdictional scope rather than imposing new substantive duties on regulated parties.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Medium FTC must issue guidance within 150 days ('shall') but retains broad discretion to set versioning criteria and designation standards, including an expedited track for imminent risks.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Medium Requires FTC to conduct individualized risk-based designation proceedings with written findings, public notice, and response opportunities — a recurring administrative adjudication load without new civil penalty mechanisms.
- Temporal Commitment High Same as above.
No signal yet
No possible riders have been surfaced for this bill.
Summary
The AI Systems Transparency Act requires companies that build or deploy artificial intelligence (AI) systems to publicly disclose how those systems work, what risks they carry, and what safeguards are in place. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is the primary enforcer. Among other elements, the bill * directs FTC to issue rules requiring AI developers to publish detailed information about their models, including safety measures for children, mental health risks, and intended uses; * requires FTC to issue parallel rules for companies that deploy AI systems to the public, not just those that build them; * empowers FTC to designate specific AI models or deployments as subject to heightened oversight based on safety risks to vulnerable users; * and treats violations of these disclosure rules as unfair or deceptive trade practices, giving FTC authority to investigate and penalize noncompliant companies.
AI-generated summary, pending human review.
| Version | Event | Date | User support | Your vote | Roll calls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Original |
Initial publication
Sep 23, 2026
|
Sep 23, 2026 | No votes yet | — | — |
Log in or create an account to record your vote on this legislation. Results are visible to all visitors.
Regulatory or Legal Changes Top 4
Mandatory public disclosure rules for AI developers
Requires AI model developers to publicly disclose how their systems work, what safety protections exist for children and vulnerable users, what uses are allowed or banned, and how risks are evaluated — in formats readable by both consumers and researchers.
- Population Scope Medium Directly regulates AI model developers as a distinct industry class, with downstream effects on users including minors and vulnerable populations — a meaningful but bounded share of the public.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low No funds are authorized or appropriated by this provision.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Creates new statutory mandates requiring AI developers to publicly disclose specific categories of model information, imposing binding substantive obligations on a regulated class that did not previously exist under federal law.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Medium The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) must act within 150 days ('shall') but retains significant rulemaking discretion over the specific form, content, and standards of required disclosures.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden High Imposes an ongoing affirmative compliance obligation on AI developers — accurate, searchable, API-accessible dual-format disclosures — backed by FTC enforcement authority.
- Temporal Commitment High Persists indefinitely until Congress acts to repeal or modify it.
No signal yet
Regulatory or Legal Changes
Mandatory public disclosure rules for AI developers
Regulatory or Legal Changes Top 4
Mandatory disclosure rules for AI deployers
Requires companies that deploy covered AI systems to the public to follow disclosure rules similar to those imposed on AI developers, ensuring transparency obligations extend across the AI supply chain beyond just model builders.
- Population Scope Medium Directly regulates covered AI deployers as a distinct class of supply-chain actors, with indirect effects on the broader public of users of deployed AI systems.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low Same as above.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Creates new statutory disclosure mandates on AI deployers — a previously unregulated class under federal law — extending substantive transparency obligations across the AI supply chain.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Medium The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) must issue rules within 150 days ('shall') but retains discretion to adapt developer-facing requirements as appropriate for the deployer context.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden High Imposes a new category of recurring affirmative compliance obligations on AI deployers, subject to FTC enforcement, where no such obligation previously existed.
- Temporal Commitment High Same as above.
No signal yet
Regulatory or Legal Changes
Mandatory disclosure rules for AI deployers
Implementation & Enforcement Top 4
FTC enforcement authority and rulemaking mandate
Treats violations of the AI disclosure requirements as unfair or deceptive trade practices under existing consumer protection law, giving the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) authority to investigate, penalize, and issue implementing rules.
- Population Scope Low Directly affects AI developers and deployers as regulated entities — a narrow industry class — rather than the general public.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low Same as above.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Creates a new statutory enforcement basis by classifying AI disclosure violations as unfair or deceptive trade practices, a new enforceable prohibition activating the full range of Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Act penalties against a previously unregulated conduct category.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Low FTC must promulgate rules within one year ('shall') under standard notice-and-comment procedures, with enforcement authority defined by reference to existing FTC Act powers rather than newly delegated discretion.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden High Stands up a new enforcement infrastructure by routing AI disclosure noncompliance through existing FTC civil penalty and investigative machinery, generating recurring case-by-case adjudication demands.
- Temporal Commitment High Same as above.
No signal yet
Implementation & Enforcement
FTC enforcement authority and rulemaking mandate
Regulatory or Legal Changes Top 4
Model versioning guidance and coverage designation rules
Requires the FTC to issue guidance and binding rules on when an AI model counts as new versus updated, when a deployment qualifies as a covered entity, and when a model poses enough safety risk to warrant heightened oversight.
- Population Scope Low Directly affects AI developers and deployers of generative AI models subject to Federal Trade Commission (FTC) coverage thresholds — a narrow industry class.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low Same as above.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth Medium Establishes procedural rules — versioning guidance, coverage threshold criteria, and designation procedures with notice and response rights — that constrain agency conduct and define jurisdictional scope rather than imposing new substantive duties on regulated parties.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Medium FTC must issue guidance within 150 days ('shall') but retains broad discretion to set versioning criteria and designation standards, including an expedited track for imminent risks.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Medium Requires FTC to conduct individualized risk-based designation proceedings with written findings, public notice, and response opportunities — a recurring administrative adjudication load without new civil penalty mechanisms.
- Temporal Commitment High Same as above.
No signal yet
Regulatory or Legal Changes
Model versioning guidance and coverage designation rules
Incomplete vote
You have not made a selection on all required items:
Choose Neutral if you prefer not to commit. Leaving without completing will remove all your votes for this bill from the totals.
Maximum recommendations reached
You have already recommended the maximum number of components allowed on this bill. To recommend [new component], choose one of your current recommendations to unselect: