Full bill text rendering is coming soon.
In the meantime, read the full text on Congress.gov ↗.
Implementation & Enforcement Top 5
Expedited removal for birth tourism
Adds birth tourism to the list of grounds that trigger fast-track deportation, establishes where removed travelers may be sent, and exempts women whose U.S. birth was incidental to lawful entry.
- Population Scope Low Directly affects only foreign nationals found inadmissible for birth tourism at or after entry, a very small population relative to all travelers or even all inadmissible aliens.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low No appropriation, authorization of funds, or fiscal obligation is created by this provision.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Expands a binding statutory removal mechanism to a new category of aliens and legislates specific removal-destination rules and a statutory exemption, creating new enforceable legal consequences that did not previously exist.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Low Expedited removal is a mandatory procedure once the trigger is found; the provision establishes default destination rules, leaving officers minimal discretion in the removal process.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden High Extends an operationally intensive removal process — with destination determinations, exemption assessments, and associated logistics — to an additional category of cases, increasing Department of Homeland Security (DHS) enforcement workload.
- Temporal Commitment High Persists indefinitely until Congress acts to repeal it.
No signal yet
Implementation & Enforcement Top 5
Criminal penalties for facilitating birth tourism
Creates a new federal crime for anyone who knowingly organizes, promotes, sponsors, or profits from birth tourism, with a maximum 15-year prison sentence, including when done on behalf of a foreign entity of concern.
- Population Scope Low Directly affects only commercial operators, promoters, and facilitators of birth tourism businesses, a narrow population of actors.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low Same as above.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Creates a new federal criminal offense under 18 U.S.C. § 1425 with a 15-year maximum sentence, establishing a binding new criminal prohibition that did not previously exist in statute.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Low Prosecution authority rests with existing Department of Justice (DOJ) actors under standard federal criminal law, with no new delegated rulemaking or expanded agency discretion created by this provision.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden High Requires DOJ to investigate, prosecute, and secure convictions under a new criminal statute, including cases involving foreign entities of concern, imposing a substantial new investigative and prosecutorial load.
- Temporal Commitment High Same as above.
No signal yet
Regulatory or Legal Changes Top 5
Inadmissibility ground for birth tourism nonimmigrants
Makes it illegal for foreign visitors on temporary visas to enter the U.S. primarily to give birth and gain citizenship for their child, with limited exceptions for legitimate medical needs and family members of citizens or legal residents. Bars the Homeland Security Secretary from using humanitarian parole to admit any foreign national whose main purpose is to give birth in the U.S. to obtain citizenship for their child, with a narrow exception for those with pending immigration applications.
- Population Scope Low Directly affects only pregnant foreign nationals on nonimmigrant visas traveling primarily for birth tourism, a very small fraction of all U.S.-bound travelers.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low Same as above.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Creates a new statutory inadmissibility ground under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) and a binding prohibition on humanitarian parole, establishing enforceable exclusions that did not previously exist in statute.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Medium Consular and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers may deny admission on a reasonable-belief standard, granting meaningful case-by-case judgment while the Secretary of Homeland Security (DHS) retains narrow parole exception authority.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Medium Imposes recurring case-by-case admissibility determinations across consular posts and ports of entry, requiring officers to assess traveler intent without bright-line criteria.
- Temporal Commitment High Same as above.
No signal yet
Regulatory or Legal Changes Top 5
Bar on visa waiver programs for birth tourism
Prohibits foreign nationals from using the Guam and Northern Mariana Islands visa waiver or the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) to enter the U.S. when their primary purpose is to give birth and obtain citizenship for their child.
- Population Scope Low Directly affects only nationals of visa-waiver-eligible countries traveling primarily for birth tourism, a very small subset of the travelers using Guam/CNMI or ESTA programs.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low Same as above.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Amends two distinct INA provisions to add birth tourism as a new statutory disqualifying condition for both the Guam/CNMI waiver and ESTA, creating binding new eligibility restrictions that did not previously exist in statute.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Low The disqualification is framed as a flat statutory bar keyed to the traveler's primary purpose, leaving officers little discretion beyond determining whether that purpose is present.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Medium Requires officers administering two separate waiver programs to assess traveler intent on a case-by-case basis, adding a new determination to existing screening workflows.
- Temporal Commitment High Same as above.
No signal yet
Regulatory or Legal Changes Top 5
B-2 visa rules and rebuttable presumption for pregnant applicants
Codifies that tourist visas cannot be used for birth tourism, sets requirements applicants must meet to get a medical-treatment visa, and presumes that a pregnant applicant likely to give birth during her stay is traveling for citizenship purposes unless she proves otherwise.
- Population Scope Low Directly affects only pregnant foreign nationals applying for B-2 tourist or medical-treatment visas, a narrow subset of all visa applicants.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low Same as above.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth Medium Codifies a regulatory interpretation into statute and adds a rebuttable presumption and affirmative evidentiary requirements for applicants, changing how consular officers adjudicate specific visa applications — a procedural constraint on agency conduct rather than a new substantive prohibition on the underlying population.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Medium Consular officers retain judgment in applying the rebuttable presumption and evaluating whether applicants have met the medical-treatment criteria, preserving meaningful decisional latitude within a structured framework.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Medium Requires recurring individualized consular adjudications under new evidentiary standards, increasing per-application workload without standing up entirely new enforcement infrastructure.
- Temporal Commitment High Same as above.
No signal yet
Implementation & Enforcement
Mandatory secondary inspection for birth tourism suspects
Requires immigration officers to send any arriving foreign national to secondary inspection when there is reason to believe the traveler may be entering primarily to give birth and obtain citizenship for a child.
No signal yet
Implementation & Enforcement
Mandatory secondary inspection for birth tourism suspects
Requires immigration officers to send any arriving foreign national to secondary inspection when there is reason to believe the traveler may be entering primarily to give birth and obtain citizenship for a child.
No signal yet
Summary
This bill targets birth tourism — the practice of foreign nationals traveling to the United States primarily so their child will be born here and gain U.S. citizenship. It changes immigration law to make this practice harder by restricting visas, entry programs, and parole, and by creating new criminal penalties for people who help run birth tourism operations. Among other elements, the bill * bars nonimmigrant visa holders from entering if their main purpose is to give birth and obtain citizenship for their child; * restricts pregnant travelers from using tourist visas (B-2) or visa waiver programs, including the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA), for birth tourism; * creates a rebuttable presumption that a pregnant visa applicant likely to give birth during her stay is traveling for citizenship purposes; * requires immigration officers to send suspected birth tourists to secondary inspection; * adds birth tourism as a ground for expedited removal from the country; * and creates a new federal crime for anyone who knowingly organizes, promotes, or profits from birth tourism operations.
AI-generated summary, pending human review.
| Version | Event | Date | User support | Your vote | Roll calls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Original |
Initial publication
Sep 24, 2026
|
Sep 24, 2026 | No votes yet | — | — |
Log in or create an account to record your vote on this legislation. Results are visible to all visitors.
Implementation & Enforcement Top 5
Expedited removal for birth tourism
Adds birth tourism to the list of grounds that trigger fast-track deportation, establishes where removed travelers may be sent, and exempts women whose U.S. birth was incidental to lawful entry.
- Population Scope Low Directly affects only foreign nationals found inadmissible for birth tourism at or after entry, a very small population relative to all travelers or even all inadmissible aliens.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low No appropriation, authorization of funds, or fiscal obligation is created by this provision.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Expands a binding statutory removal mechanism to a new category of aliens and legislates specific removal-destination rules and a statutory exemption, creating new enforceable legal consequences that did not previously exist.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Low Expedited removal is a mandatory procedure once the trigger is found; the provision establishes default destination rules, leaving officers minimal discretion in the removal process.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden High Extends an operationally intensive removal process — with destination determinations, exemption assessments, and associated logistics — to an additional category of cases, increasing Department of Homeland Security (DHS) enforcement workload.
- Temporal Commitment High Persists indefinitely until Congress acts to repeal it.
No signal yet
Implementation & Enforcement
Expedited removal for birth tourism
Implementation & Enforcement Top 5
Criminal penalties for facilitating birth tourism
Creates a new federal crime for anyone who knowingly organizes, promotes, sponsors, or profits from birth tourism, with a maximum 15-year prison sentence, including when done on behalf of a foreign entity of concern.
- Population Scope Low Directly affects only commercial operators, promoters, and facilitators of birth tourism businesses, a narrow population of actors.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low Same as above.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Creates a new federal criminal offense under 18 U.S.C. § 1425 with a 15-year maximum sentence, establishing a binding new criminal prohibition that did not previously exist in statute.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Low Prosecution authority rests with existing Department of Justice (DOJ) actors under standard federal criminal law, with no new delegated rulemaking or expanded agency discretion created by this provision.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden High Requires DOJ to investigate, prosecute, and secure convictions under a new criminal statute, including cases involving foreign entities of concern, imposing a substantial new investigative and prosecutorial load.
- Temporal Commitment High Same as above.
No signal yet
Implementation & Enforcement
Criminal penalties for facilitating birth tourism
Regulatory or Legal Changes Top 5
Inadmissibility ground for birth tourism nonimmigrants
Makes it illegal for foreign visitors on temporary visas to enter the U.S. primarily to give birth and gain citizenship for their child, with limited exceptions for legitimate medical needs and family members of citizens or legal residents. Bars the Homeland Security Secretary from using humanitarian parole to admit any foreign national whose main purpose is to give birth in the U.S. to obtain citizenship for their child, with a narrow exception for those with pending immigration applications.
- Population Scope Low Directly affects only pregnant foreign nationals on nonimmigrant visas traveling primarily for birth tourism, a very small fraction of all U.S.-bound travelers.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low Same as above.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Creates a new statutory inadmissibility ground under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) and a binding prohibition on humanitarian parole, establishing enforceable exclusions that did not previously exist in statute.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Medium Consular and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers may deny admission on a reasonable-belief standard, granting meaningful case-by-case judgment while the Secretary of Homeland Security (DHS) retains narrow parole exception authority.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Medium Imposes recurring case-by-case admissibility determinations across consular posts and ports of entry, requiring officers to assess traveler intent without bright-line criteria.
- Temporal Commitment High Same as above.
No signal yet
Regulatory or Legal Changes
Inadmissibility ground for birth tourism nonimmigrants
Regulatory or Legal Changes Top 5
Bar on visa waiver programs for birth tourism
Prohibits foreign nationals from using the Guam and Northern Mariana Islands visa waiver or the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) to enter the U.S. when their primary purpose is to give birth and obtain citizenship for their child.
- Population Scope Low Directly affects only nationals of visa-waiver-eligible countries traveling primarily for birth tourism, a very small subset of the travelers using Guam/CNMI or ESTA programs.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low Same as above.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Amends two distinct INA provisions to add birth tourism as a new statutory disqualifying condition for both the Guam/CNMI waiver and ESTA, creating binding new eligibility restrictions that did not previously exist in statute.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Low The disqualification is framed as a flat statutory bar keyed to the traveler's primary purpose, leaving officers little discretion beyond determining whether that purpose is present.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Medium Requires officers administering two separate waiver programs to assess traveler intent on a case-by-case basis, adding a new determination to existing screening workflows.
- Temporal Commitment High Same as above.
No signal yet
Regulatory or Legal Changes
Bar on visa waiver programs for birth tourism
Regulatory or Legal Changes Top 5
B-2 visa rules and rebuttable presumption for pregnant applicants
Codifies that tourist visas cannot be used for birth tourism, sets requirements applicants must meet to get a medical-treatment visa, and presumes that a pregnant applicant likely to give birth during her stay is traveling for citizenship purposes unless she proves otherwise.
- Population Scope Low Directly affects only pregnant foreign nationals applying for B-2 tourist or medical-treatment visas, a narrow subset of all visa applicants.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low Same as above.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth Medium Codifies a regulatory interpretation into statute and adds a rebuttable presumption and affirmative evidentiary requirements for applicants, changing how consular officers adjudicate specific visa applications — a procedural constraint on agency conduct rather than a new substantive prohibition on the underlying population.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Medium Consular officers retain judgment in applying the rebuttable presumption and evaluating whether applicants have met the medical-treatment criteria, preserving meaningful decisional latitude within a structured framework.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Medium Requires recurring individualized consular adjudications under new evidentiary standards, increasing per-application workload without standing up entirely new enforcement infrastructure.
- Temporal Commitment High Same as above.
No signal yet
Regulatory or Legal Changes
B-2 visa rules and rebuttable presumption for pregnant applicants
Incomplete vote
You have not made a selection on all required items:
Choose Neutral if you prefer not to commit. Leaving without completing will remove all your votes for this bill from the totals.
Maximum recommendations reached
You have already recommended the maximum number of components allowed on this bill. To recommend [new component], choose one of your current recommendations to unselect: