Full bill text rendering is coming soon.
In the meantime, read the full text on Congress.gov ↗.
Funding / Appropriations Top 5
Foreign Assistance Act amendment: S&T cooperation authority
Amends the Foreign Assistance Act to let the President provide grants, cooperative agreements, and technical help to allied countries for critical minerals, energy, and emerging technology projects, with the State Department managing the assistance.
- Population Scope Low Directly affects allied foreign governments, foreign research organizations, and a limited class of U.S. entities collaborating on international science and technology projects — a narrow international recipient population.
- Budgetary Magnitude Medium Authorizes transfer of funds from existing 'National Security Investment Programs' appropriations accounts and creates new authority to obligate grants and cooperative agreements across 13 project categories, representing a meaningful but bounded discretionary spending authority without a specified dollar ceiling.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Adds a new section 536 to the Foreign Assistance Act granting the President authority to furnish international science and technology assistance — a permanent amendment to a foundational statute creating new substantive spending and grant authority.
- Degree of Discretion Granted High Grants the President broad authority to provide assistance across 13 enumerated categories, with the Secretary of State holding transfer authority over designated appropriations accounts, subject only to a 15-day notification rather than prior approval.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Medium Requires recurring pre-obligation congressional notification to four committees, creating a procedural compliance obligation for every assistance action taken under the new authority.
- Temporal Commitment Low Subject to the Act's 10-year sunset, this Foreign Assistance Act authority self-terminates unless Congress acts to extend it.
No signal yet
Regulatory or Legal Changes Top 5
Country and entity eligibility rules, countries of concern bar
Sets rules for which countries and organizations can join the program. Allied nations with trade agreements get preference; countries and entities linked to adversary nations like China are completely banned from participating.
- Population Scope Low Directly affects a narrow population of foreign governments, research institutions, and private entities seeking program access, plus entities categorically excluded as countries of concern.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low No funds are authorized or appropriated by the eligibility provisions.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Creates binding eligibility criteria and an absolute statutory prohibition on participation by countries of concern and their entities — a new enforceable exclusion with no agency waiver authority.
- Degree of Discretion Granted High Grants the Secretary of State broad discretionary authority to assess alliance status, human rights records, and trade agreement status in determining country and entity eligibility, while the exclusion of countries of concern is non-discretionary.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Medium Requires case-by-case eligibility adjudication by the Secretary of State for each prospective country and entity partner, creating a recurring gatekeeping burden without formal penalties.
- Temporal Commitment Low Subject to the Act's 10-year sunset, the eligibility framework self-terminates unless Congress acts to extend it.
No signal yet
Core Policy Mechanism Top 5
Creates Critical Minerals Innovation Partnership Program
Creates a new State Department program to build international partnerships on critical minerals technology, aimed at strengthening U.S. national security and supply chain resilience. A Director appointed by the Secretary leads the program.
- Population Scope Low Directly affects a narrow set of State Department (DoS) personnel, allied foreign governments, and critical minerals sector institutions — a small, specialized population rather than a broad share of the U.S. public.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low No direct appropriation or fund authorization; the program is established within the existing DoS structure without identifying new spending.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Creates a new statutory program with a mandated Director appointment and defined national security objectives — a new institutional mandate, not merely a procedural change.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Medium The Secretary of State 'may' appoint the Director from existing personnel, preserving flexibility in implementation, while the program's establishment itself is mandatory.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Low No enforcement mechanisms, penalties, or compliance obligations are created; the provision is purely structural and organizational.
- Temporal Commitment Low A hard 10-year sunset terminates all program authorities, meaning the program self-expires unless Congress affirmatively extends it.
No signal yet
Core Policy Mechanism Top 5
Director's responsibilities and Country Teams authority
Assigns the program Director specific duties — including coordinating with federal agencies, aligning technical standards, aggregating mineral demand, and managing partnerships — and authorizes creation of overseas Country Teams at U.S. diplomatic posts.
- Population Scope Low Primarily affects the Director, a small number of U.S. diplomatic post personnel, and partner country representatives — a narrow operational population.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low No funds are specifically authorized or appropriated by this provision.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Imposes mandatory statutory duties on the Director and creates new authority to establish overseas Country Teams — a new set of binding institutional obligations on a named federal official.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Medium The Director is authorized ('may') to establish Country Teams, preserving discretion in deployment, while core coordination and monitoring responsibilities are mandatory ('shall').
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Low No enforcement mechanisms or penalties; the burden is internal coordination and reporting rather than external compliance obligations.
- Temporal Commitment Low All Director authorities and Country Teams are subject to the Act's 10-year sunset, self-terminating without Congressional extension.
No signal yet
Core Policy Mechanism Top 5
International Centers of Excellence for Critical Minerals
Directs the State Department to establish overseas research and technical assistance hubs focused on critical minerals. These centers conduct applied research, help partner countries build regulatory capacity, and deploy digital monitoring tools.
- Population Scope Low Directly affects partner country governments, foreign research institutions, and a limited set of U.S. entities engaged in international critical minerals research — a narrow specialized population.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low No direct appropriation is specified; centers are administered within existing authorities without a dedicated funding stream identified in this provision.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Directs the Secretary to seek to establish new international institutional structures with a defined set of authorized activities, creating a new statutory mandate for overseas program infrastructure.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Medium The 'seek to establish' framing preserves implementation discretion, while the authorized activities list bounds the permissible scope of center operations.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Low No enforcement mechanisms or compliance obligations; operational burden falls on coordinating federal agencies and partner countries rather than regulated entities.
- Temporal Commitment Low Centers operate under the Act's 10-year sunset and self-terminate unless Congress acts to extend the program.
No signal yet
Implementation & Enforcement
Pre-partnership congressional notification mandate
Requires the program Director to notify Congress, transmit partnership agreement text, and hold an in-person briefing at least 30 days before finalizing any partnership with a foreign country or entity.
No signal yet
Regulatory or Legal Changes
Mandatory partnership agreement content requirements
Requires every partnership agreement under the program to include specific elements: shared objectives, benchmarks, multiyear plans, dispute resolution terms, intellectual property rules, controlled information procedures, and a process for considering outside proposals.
No signal yet
Core Policy Mechanism
Director personnel detail authority
Lets the program Director borrow staff from other federal agencies on a reimbursable basis and assign program staff to assist those agencies, enabling flexible interagency staffing for the critical minerals program.
No signal yet
Core Policy Mechanism
Public digital platform for program participation
Requires the State Department to launch and maintain a public website where U.S. companies — including startups — can find program opportunities, submit project proposals, and connect with partner country stakeholders in the critical minerals space.
No signal yet
Core Policy Mechanism
NSTC liaison and NDTIBC technology submission requirements
Designates the Director as liaison to a federal science and technology coordination body and requires the Secretary to submit program-developed technologies to a national defense council to speed their move from research to real-world use.
No signal yet
Duration, Sunset, and Review
10-year sunset with pre-termination agreement protection
Ends all program authorities 10 years after the law takes effect, but lets existing partnerships and grants run to completion and allows continued spending of funds committed before the expiration date.
No signal yet
Implementation & Enforcement
Pre-partnership congressional notification mandate
Requires the program Director to notify Congress, transmit partnership agreement text, and hold an in-person briefing at least 30 days before finalizing any partnership with a foreign country or entity.
No signal yet
Regulatory or Legal Changes
Mandatory partnership agreement content requirements
Requires every partnership agreement under the program to include specific elements: shared objectives, benchmarks, multiyear plans, dispute resolution terms, intellectual property rules, controlled information procedures, and a process for considering outside proposals.
No signal yet
Core Policy Mechanism
Director personnel detail authority
Lets the program Director borrow staff from other federal agencies on a reimbursable basis and assign program staff to assist those agencies, enabling flexible interagency staffing for the critical minerals program.
No signal yet
Core Policy Mechanism
Public digital platform for program participation
Requires the State Department to launch and maintain a public website where U.S. companies — including startups — can find program opportunities, submit project proposals, and connect with partner country stakeholders in the critical minerals space.
No signal yet
Core Policy Mechanism
NSTC liaison and NDTIBC technology submission requirements
Designates the Director as liaison to a federal science and technology coordination body and requires the Secretary to submit program-developed technologies to a national defense council to speed their move from research to real-world use.
No signal yet
Duration, Sunset, and Review
10-year sunset with pre-termination agreement protection
Ends all program authorities 10 years after the law takes effect, but lets existing partnerships and grants run to completion and allows continued spending of funds committed before the expiration date.
No signal yet
Summary
The Strategic Technology and Resilient Alliances Act (STRATA Act) of 2026 creates a new program inside the State Department to build international partnerships around critical minerals — the raw materials needed for electronics, batteries, and defense systems. The goal is to reduce U.S. dependence on foreign adversaries for these materials by working with allied nations and U.S. companies on research, technology, and supply chain development. Among other elements, the bill * creates a Critical Minerals Innovation Partnership Program (CMIPP) within the State Department, led by a newly appointed Director, to coordinate international cooperation on critical minerals technology; * establishes International Centers of Excellence abroad to conduct applied research, build partner-country capacity, and deploy monitoring tools; * requires a public digital platform where U.S. companies — including startups — can find and apply for program opportunities; * amends the Foreign Assistance Act to let the President provide grants and technical help to allied countries for critical minerals and energy technology projects; * bars countries and entities of concern — such as China — from any participation in the program; * and sets a 10-year expiration on all program authorities, while protecting agreements already in place.
AI-generated summary, pending human review.
| Version | Event | Date | User support | Your vote | Roll calls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Original |
Initial publication
Sep 30, 2026
|
Sep 30, 2026 | No votes yet | — | — |
Log in or create an account to record your vote on this legislation. Results are visible to all visitors.
Funding / Appropriations Top 5
Foreign Assistance Act amendment: S&T cooperation authority
Amends the Foreign Assistance Act to let the President provide grants, cooperative agreements, and technical help to allied countries for critical minerals, energy, and emerging technology projects, with the State Department managing the assistance.
- Population Scope Low Directly affects allied foreign governments, foreign research organizations, and a limited class of U.S. entities collaborating on international science and technology projects — a narrow international recipient population.
- Budgetary Magnitude Medium Authorizes transfer of funds from existing 'National Security Investment Programs' appropriations accounts and creates new authority to obligate grants and cooperative agreements across 13 project categories, representing a meaningful but bounded discretionary spending authority without a specified dollar ceiling.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Adds a new section 536 to the Foreign Assistance Act granting the President authority to furnish international science and technology assistance — a permanent amendment to a foundational statute creating new substantive spending and grant authority.
- Degree of Discretion Granted High Grants the President broad authority to provide assistance across 13 enumerated categories, with the Secretary of State holding transfer authority over designated appropriations accounts, subject only to a 15-day notification rather than prior approval.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Medium Requires recurring pre-obligation congressional notification to four committees, creating a procedural compliance obligation for every assistance action taken under the new authority.
- Temporal Commitment Low Subject to the Act's 10-year sunset, this Foreign Assistance Act authority self-terminates unless Congress acts to extend it.
No signal yet
Funding / Appropriations
Foreign Assistance Act amendment: S&T cooperation authority
Regulatory or Legal Changes Top 5
Country and entity eligibility rules, countries of concern bar
Sets rules for which countries and organizations can join the program. Allied nations with trade agreements get preference; countries and entities linked to adversary nations like China are completely banned from participating.
- Population Scope Low Directly affects a narrow population of foreign governments, research institutions, and private entities seeking program access, plus entities categorically excluded as countries of concern.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low No funds are authorized or appropriated by the eligibility provisions.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Creates binding eligibility criteria and an absolute statutory prohibition on participation by countries of concern and their entities — a new enforceable exclusion with no agency waiver authority.
- Degree of Discretion Granted High Grants the Secretary of State broad discretionary authority to assess alliance status, human rights records, and trade agreement status in determining country and entity eligibility, while the exclusion of countries of concern is non-discretionary.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Medium Requires case-by-case eligibility adjudication by the Secretary of State for each prospective country and entity partner, creating a recurring gatekeeping burden without formal penalties.
- Temporal Commitment Low Subject to the Act's 10-year sunset, the eligibility framework self-terminates unless Congress acts to extend it.
No signal yet
Regulatory or Legal Changes
Country and entity eligibility rules, countries of concern bar
Core Policy Mechanism Top 5
Creates Critical Minerals Innovation Partnership Program
Creates a new State Department program to build international partnerships on critical minerals technology, aimed at strengthening U.S. national security and supply chain resilience. A Director appointed by the Secretary leads the program.
- Population Scope Low Directly affects a narrow set of State Department (DoS) personnel, allied foreign governments, and critical minerals sector institutions — a small, specialized population rather than a broad share of the U.S. public.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low No direct appropriation or fund authorization; the program is established within the existing DoS structure without identifying new spending.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Creates a new statutory program with a mandated Director appointment and defined national security objectives — a new institutional mandate, not merely a procedural change.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Medium The Secretary of State 'may' appoint the Director from existing personnel, preserving flexibility in implementation, while the program's establishment itself is mandatory.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Low No enforcement mechanisms, penalties, or compliance obligations are created; the provision is purely structural and organizational.
- Temporal Commitment Low A hard 10-year sunset terminates all program authorities, meaning the program self-expires unless Congress affirmatively extends it.
No signal yet
Core Policy Mechanism
Creates Critical Minerals Innovation Partnership Program
Core Policy Mechanism Top 5
Director's responsibilities and Country Teams authority
Assigns the program Director specific duties — including coordinating with federal agencies, aligning technical standards, aggregating mineral demand, and managing partnerships — and authorizes creation of overseas Country Teams at U.S. diplomatic posts.
- Population Scope Low Primarily affects the Director, a small number of U.S. diplomatic post personnel, and partner country representatives — a narrow operational population.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low No funds are specifically authorized or appropriated by this provision.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Imposes mandatory statutory duties on the Director and creates new authority to establish overseas Country Teams — a new set of binding institutional obligations on a named federal official.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Medium The Director is authorized ('may') to establish Country Teams, preserving discretion in deployment, while core coordination and monitoring responsibilities are mandatory ('shall').
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Low No enforcement mechanisms or penalties; the burden is internal coordination and reporting rather than external compliance obligations.
- Temporal Commitment Low All Director authorities and Country Teams are subject to the Act's 10-year sunset, self-terminating without Congressional extension.
No signal yet
Core Policy Mechanism
Director's responsibilities and Country Teams authority
Core Policy Mechanism Top 5
International Centers of Excellence for Critical Minerals
Directs the State Department to establish overseas research and technical assistance hubs focused on critical minerals. These centers conduct applied research, help partner countries build regulatory capacity, and deploy digital monitoring tools.
- Population Scope Low Directly affects partner country governments, foreign research institutions, and a limited set of U.S. entities engaged in international critical minerals research — a narrow specialized population.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low No direct appropriation is specified; centers are administered within existing authorities without a dedicated funding stream identified in this provision.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Directs the Secretary to seek to establish new international institutional structures with a defined set of authorized activities, creating a new statutory mandate for overseas program infrastructure.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Medium The 'seek to establish' framing preserves implementation discretion, while the authorized activities list bounds the permissible scope of center operations.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Low No enforcement mechanisms or compliance obligations; operational burden falls on coordinating federal agencies and partner countries rather than regulated entities.
- Temporal Commitment Low Centers operate under the Act's 10-year sunset and self-terminate unless Congress acts to extend the program.
No signal yet
Core Policy Mechanism
International Centers of Excellence for Critical Minerals
Incomplete vote
You have not made a selection on all required items:
Choose Neutral if you prefer not to commit. Leaving without completing will remove all your votes for this bill from the totals.
Maximum recommendations reached
You have already recommended the maximum number of components allowed on this bill. To recommend [new component], choose one of your current recommendations to unselect: