Full bill text rendering is coming soon.
In the meantime, read the full text on Congress.gov ↗.
Core Policy Mechanism Top 3
Restoration authorization for drinking water and wildfire-degraded rivers
Authorizes the federal government to restore Wild and Scenic River segments that supply downstream drinking water or have been damaged by catastrophic wildfire, including work to recover endangered species and improve ecological function. Requires federal agencies to publish implementation and management plans for newly covered river segments, assess and mitigate wildfire risks, and — at tribal request — assess and manage culturally significant native species including traditional foods. Designates dozens of river segments across Oregon and into California as new components of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System (NWSRS), each classified as wild, scenic, or recreational to define the level of federal protection that applies. Expands federal river management law to let agencies enter formal agreements with tribal governments — alongside states and local governments — to jointly administer Wild and Scenic River segments and requires agencies to actively encourage that cooperation. Sets a new standard requiring any river segment newly designated as wild and scenic in Oregon to have boundaries averaging 640 acres of protected land per mile on both sides, overriding the default federal standard. Previously designated segments are exempt. Closes all federal land within Oregon's wild and scenic river boundaries to mining, mineral leasing, geothermal leasing, and other public land disposal, protecting those corridors from extractive resource development. Adds dozens of tributary stream segments to the Rogue River, Snake River, and Illinois River wild and scenic systems in Oregon, classifying each as wild, scenic, or recreational to set their level of federal protection.
- Population Scope Low Directly affects communities drawing drinking water from designated Oregon river segments and agencies managing wildfire-degraded corridors — a narrow, geographically bounded population well under 10% of the U.S.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low Authorizes restoration expenditures subject to appropriations but sets no funding ceiling, making actual spending contingent on future congressional action with no guaranteed outlay.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Creates an interlocking set of new statutory mandates — designation of hundreds of river segments into the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System (NWSRS), a binding 640-acre boundary rule, a categorical mineral withdrawal across Oregon river corridors, tribal cooperative agreement authority, and mandatory management and wildfire-risk planning obligations — collectively restructuring the substantive legal framework governing these waterways.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Medium Blends mandatory duties (publish implementation plans, assess wildfire risks, respond to tribal species requests) with permissive authorities ("may" develop ecological projects, enter cooperative agreements), giving agencies structured but meaningful latitude in execution.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Medium Imposes recurring affirmative compliance obligations — phased management planning across dozens of segments, wildfire-risk assessments, tribal species consultations, and plan submissions to county and tribal governments — requiring sustained multi-agency administrative effort without creating new penalty mechanisms.
- Temporal Commitment High River designations, mineral withdrawals, and management mandates operate as permanent statutory changes that persist indefinitely until Congress acts to repeal them.
No signal yet
Regulatory or Legal Changes Top 3
Essential serpentine wetland withdrawal and conservation strategy
Withdraws federal land within essential serpentine wetlands in Oregon and California from mining, mineral leasing, and public land disposal, and directs agencies to implement an interagency conservation strategy for those wetlands, including a public map review process. Withdraws federal land within 19 named botanical areas and areas of critical environmental concern in Oregon's Illinois Watershed from mining, mineral leasing, and public land disposal, creating permanent protections for those special management areas.
- Population Scope Low Directly affects mining claimants, mineral lessees, and land users on federal parcels within serpentine wetlands and 19 named Illinois Watershed areas in Oregon and California — a narrow, site-specific population well under 10% of the U.S.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low No funds are authorized or appropriated; implementation costs (mapping, plan amendments) are absorbed within existing agency appropriations.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Creates new statutory prohibitions withdrawing identified federal lands from the full suite of public land entry, mining, leasing, and disposal laws — a categorical substantive restriction on land use — and imposes an affirmative mandate to implement an interagency conservation strategy and amend land management plans accordingly.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Low Withdrawal and conservation strategy implementation are framed as mandatory directives with a fixed one-year mapping deadline and 90-day comment period, leaving agencies little discretion over whether to act.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Medium Requires the Secretaries of Agriculture and Interior to publish draft and final maps, manage a public comment process, and amend land management plans — a defined sequence of administrative obligations across two agencies without new penalty mechanisms.
- Temporal Commitment High Withdrawals are permanent upon publication of final maps, persisting indefinitely absent congressional repeal, and the conservation strategy mandate similarly has no sunset or reauthorization trigger.
No signal yet
Carve-outs, Exemptions, Eligibility Top 3
Private rights and consent-based acquisition protections in covered segments
Protects existing private rights, contracts, and facility access on federal land within covered river segments, and prohibits the government from acquiring private land within those boundaries without the landowner's consent.
- Population Scope Low Directly affects only private landowners, inholding rights-holders, and utility operators within the boundaries of designated river segments — a small, geographically defined subset of the U.S. population.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low No funds are authorized or appropriated; the provision operates as a constraint on government acquisition authority rather than a spending mechanism.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth Medium Creates a new statutory prohibition on non-consensual federal land acquisition within covered segment boundaries and codifies permit and easement protections for inholders — a procedural constraint on agency discretion rather than a broad restructuring of substantive property law.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Low Operates as a hard prohibition: the Secretary cannot acquire land without owner consent, leaving no agency discretion in that core restriction.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Low Requires no new enforcement infrastructure; the prohibition is self-executing and imposes no affirmative compliance obligations on regulated parties.
- Temporal Commitment High Protections are permanent upon enactment with no expiry, review trigger, or reauthorization requirement, binding future administrations indefinitely.
No signal yet
No possible riders have been surfaced for this bill.
Summary
The River Democracy Act designates hundreds of river segments in Oregon (and a small number in California) as protected waterways under the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System (NWSRS). It also withdraws federal land near those rivers from mining and mineral leasing, protects special natural areas, and updates the rules for how federal agencies work with tribes, states, and local governments to manage designated rivers. Among other elements, the bill * adds dozens of new river segments in Oregon and California to the NWSRS, classifying each as wild, scenic, or recreational; * withdraws federal land within Oregon's wild and scenic river boundaries from mining, mineral leasing, and other extractive uses; * requires management plans for newly covered segments, including wildfire risk assessments and culturally significant species plans developed with tribes; * expands the ability of federal agencies to enter cooperative agreements with tribal governments for river administration; * protects essential serpentine wetlands and named botanical areas in the Illinois Watershed from mining and disposal; * and preserves existing private property rights within designated river boundaries.
AI-generated summary, pending human review.
| Version | Event | Date | User support | Your vote | Roll calls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Original |
Initial publication
Sep 30, 2026
|
Sep 30, 2026 | No votes yet | — | — |
Log in or create an account to record your vote on this legislation. Results are visible to all visitors.
Core Policy Mechanism Top 3
Restoration authorization for drinking water and wildfire-degraded rivers
Authorizes the federal government to restore Wild and Scenic River segments that supply downstream drinking water or have been damaged by catastrophic wildfire, including work to recover endangered species and improve ecological function. Requires federal agencies to publish implementation and management plans for newly covered river segments, assess and mitigate wildfire risks, and — at tribal request — assess and manage culturally significant native species including traditional foods. Designates dozens of river segments across Oregon and into California as new components of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System (NWSRS), each classified as wild, scenic, or recreational to define the level of federal protection that applies. Expands federal river management law to let agencies enter formal agreements with tribal governments — alongside states and local governments — to jointly administer Wild and Scenic River segments and requires agencies to actively encourage that cooperation. Sets a new standard requiring any river segment newly designated as wild and scenic in Oregon to have boundaries averaging 640 acres of protected land per mile on both sides, overriding the default federal standard. Previously designated segments are exempt. Closes all federal land within Oregon's wild and scenic river boundaries to mining, mineral leasing, geothermal leasing, and other public land disposal, protecting those corridors from extractive resource development. Adds dozens of tributary stream segments to the Rogue River, Snake River, and Illinois River wild and scenic systems in Oregon, classifying each as wild, scenic, or recreational to set their level of federal protection.
- Population Scope Low Directly affects communities drawing drinking water from designated Oregon river segments and agencies managing wildfire-degraded corridors — a narrow, geographically bounded population well under 10% of the U.S.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low Authorizes restoration expenditures subject to appropriations but sets no funding ceiling, making actual spending contingent on future congressional action with no guaranteed outlay.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Creates an interlocking set of new statutory mandates — designation of hundreds of river segments into the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System (NWSRS), a binding 640-acre boundary rule, a categorical mineral withdrawal across Oregon river corridors, tribal cooperative agreement authority, and mandatory management and wildfire-risk planning obligations — collectively restructuring the substantive legal framework governing these waterways.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Medium Blends mandatory duties (publish implementation plans, assess wildfire risks, respond to tribal species requests) with permissive authorities ("may" develop ecological projects, enter cooperative agreements), giving agencies structured but meaningful latitude in execution.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Medium Imposes recurring affirmative compliance obligations — phased management planning across dozens of segments, wildfire-risk assessments, tribal species consultations, and plan submissions to county and tribal governments — requiring sustained multi-agency administrative effort without creating new penalty mechanisms.
- Temporal Commitment High River designations, mineral withdrawals, and management mandates operate as permanent statutory changes that persist indefinitely until Congress acts to repeal them.
No signal yet
Core Policy Mechanism
Restoration authorization for drinking water and wildfire-degraded rivers
Regulatory or Legal Changes Top 3
Essential serpentine wetland withdrawal and conservation strategy
Withdraws federal land within essential serpentine wetlands in Oregon and California from mining, mineral leasing, and public land disposal, and directs agencies to implement an interagency conservation strategy for those wetlands, including a public map review process. Withdraws federal land within 19 named botanical areas and areas of critical environmental concern in Oregon's Illinois Watershed from mining, mineral leasing, and public land disposal, creating permanent protections for those special management areas.
- Population Scope Low Directly affects mining claimants, mineral lessees, and land users on federal parcels within serpentine wetlands and 19 named Illinois Watershed areas in Oregon and California — a narrow, site-specific population well under 10% of the U.S.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low No funds are authorized or appropriated; implementation costs (mapping, plan amendments) are absorbed within existing agency appropriations.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth High Creates new statutory prohibitions withdrawing identified federal lands from the full suite of public land entry, mining, leasing, and disposal laws — a categorical substantive restriction on land use — and imposes an affirmative mandate to implement an interagency conservation strategy and amend land management plans accordingly.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Low Withdrawal and conservation strategy implementation are framed as mandatory directives with a fixed one-year mapping deadline and 90-day comment period, leaving agencies little discretion over whether to act.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Medium Requires the Secretaries of Agriculture and Interior to publish draft and final maps, manage a public comment process, and amend land management plans — a defined sequence of administrative obligations across two agencies without new penalty mechanisms.
- Temporal Commitment High Withdrawals are permanent upon publication of final maps, persisting indefinitely absent congressional repeal, and the conservation strategy mandate similarly has no sunset or reauthorization trigger.
No signal yet
Regulatory or Legal Changes
Essential serpentine wetland withdrawal and conservation strategy
Carve-outs, Exemptions, Eligibility Top 3
Private rights and consent-based acquisition protections in covered segments
Protects existing private rights, contracts, and facility access on federal land within covered river segments, and prohibits the government from acquiring private land within those boundaries without the landowner's consent.
- Population Scope Low Directly affects only private landowners, inholding rights-holders, and utility operators within the boundaries of designated river segments — a small, geographically defined subset of the U.S. population.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low No funds are authorized or appropriated; the provision operates as a constraint on government acquisition authority rather than a spending mechanism.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth Medium Creates a new statutory prohibition on non-consensual federal land acquisition within covered segment boundaries and codifies permit and easement protections for inholders — a procedural constraint on agency discretion rather than a broad restructuring of substantive property law.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Low Operates as a hard prohibition: the Secretary cannot acquire land without owner consent, leaving no agency discretion in that core restriction.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Low Requires no new enforcement infrastructure; the prohibition is self-executing and imposes no affirmative compliance obligations on regulated parties.
- Temporal Commitment High Protections are permanent upon enactment with no expiry, review trigger, or reauthorization requirement, binding future administrations indefinitely.
No signal yet
Carve-outs, Exemptions, Eligibility
Private rights and consent-based acquisition protections in covered segments
Incomplete vote
You have not made a selection on all required items:
Choose Neutral if you prefer not to commit. Leaving without completing will remove all your votes for this bill from the totals.
Maximum recommendations reached
You have already recommended the maximum number of components allowed on this bill. To recommend [new component], choose one of your current recommendations to unselect: