Full bill text rendering is coming soon.
In the meantime, read the full text on Congress.gov ↗.
Core Policy Mechanism Top 1
Navy Vessel Naming Process and Transparency Requirements
Requires the Navy to publish criteria for naming ships, obtain historical assessments before naming decisions, and provide written rationales — including reasons for departing from expert recommendations or removing existing names.
- Population Scope Low Directly binds only the Secretary of the Navy and the Naval History and Heritage Command (NHHC), with disclosure obligations to congressional defense committees — a narrow set of federal institutional actors, not the general public.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low No funds are authorized, appropriated, or obligated; compliance relies on existing agency operations within the Navy and NHHC.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth Medium Imposes new procedural statutory duties on the Secretary of the Navy — mandatory consultation, written rationales, and public disclosure — constraining existing executive discretion over ship naming without altering substantive rights or prohibitions across a regulated population.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Low Mandatory 'shall' language governs every requirement, and the Secretary retains only narrow residual discretion to depart from NHHC recommendations provided a written explanation is given.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Low No new enforcement infrastructure, penalties, or compliance machinery is created; the burden is limited to an affirmative documentation and disclosure obligation within existing agency channels.
- Temporal Commitment High Persists indefinitely until Congress acts to repeal or amend it.
No signal yet
No possible riders have been surfaced for this bill.
Summary
This bill requires the Secretary of the Navy to create and publish clear rules for how Navy ships are named or renamed. Before any vessel is named, the Navy must get a written assessment from the Naval History and Heritage Command (NHHC), provide a written reason for the chosen name, explain any departure from the NHHC's top recommendation, and — when renaming a ship — explain why the old name is being removed. All written decisions must be shared with congressional defense committees and made available to the public.
AI-generated summary, pending human review.
| Version | Event | Date | User support | Your vote | Roll calls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Original |
Initial publication
Sep 30, 2026
|
Sep 30, 2026 | No votes yet | — | — |
Log in or create an account to record your vote on this legislation. Results are visible to all visitors.
Core Policy Mechanism Top 1
Navy Vessel Naming Process and Transparency Requirements
Requires the Navy to publish criteria for naming ships, obtain historical assessments before naming decisions, and provide written rationales — including reasons for departing from expert recommendations or removing existing names.
- Population Scope Low Directly binds only the Secretary of the Navy and the Naval History and Heritage Command (NHHC), with disclosure obligations to congressional defense committees — a narrow set of federal institutional actors, not the general public.
- Budgetary Magnitude Low No funds are authorized, appropriated, or obligated; compliance relies on existing agency operations within the Navy and NHHC.
- Legal / Regulatory Depth Medium Imposes new procedural statutory duties on the Secretary of the Navy — mandatory consultation, written rationales, and public disclosure — constraining existing executive discretion over ship naming without altering substantive rights or prohibitions across a regulated population.
- Degree of Discretion Granted Low Mandatory 'shall' language governs every requirement, and the Secretary retains only narrow residual discretion to depart from NHHC recommendations provided a written explanation is given.
- Implementation & Enforcement Burden Low No new enforcement infrastructure, penalties, or compliance machinery is created; the burden is limited to an affirmative documentation and disclosure obligation within existing agency channels.
- Temporal Commitment High Persists indefinitely until Congress acts to repeal or amend it.
No signal yet
Core Policy Mechanism
Navy Vessel Naming Process and Transparency Requirements
Incomplete vote
You have not made a selection on all required items:
Choose Neutral if you prefer not to commit. Leaving without completing will remove all your votes for this bill from the totals.
Maximum recommendations reached
You have already recommended the maximum number of components allowed on this bill. To recommend [new component], choose one of your current recommendations to unselect: